EQT Corporation (NYSE:EQT) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 25% Loss Over the Past Year
EQT Corporation (NYSE:EQT) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 25% Loss Over the Past Year
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in EQT implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 51% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
- Recent sales by insiders
- 機構對EQt的實質性持股意味着它們對該公司的股價具有重要影響
- 前八大股東持有該業務的51%。
- 最近由內部人士出售。
If you want to know who really controls EQT Corporation (NYSE:EQT), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 81% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制EQt公司(NYSE:EQT),則需要查看其股權登記冊的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有公司的大部分股權,佔81%。換句話說,該群體面臨最大的盈利潛力(或下行風險)。
Last week's US$624m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 25% losses.
上週62400萬美元的市值增長可能會受到機構投資者的欣賞,尤其是在經歷了25%的虧損後。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of EQT.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了EQt的不同所有權組之間的差異。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240818/0-001dd3c30ce4253452a3cfe8b63830a8-0-83fcd09e19fd74ee20294654bd32a820.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About EQT?
機構所有權對EQT告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in EQT. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see EQT's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在EQt中擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這支股票,並且喜歡它。但是像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯了。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總有一個風險,即它們處於「擁擠的交易」中。當這樣一筆交易出錯時,多個方會競相快速拋售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更大。您可以在下面了解EQt的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容的。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240818/0-001dd3c30ce4253452a3cfe8b63830a8-1-5a3da23b25bc1963bade9ed536a86912.png/big)
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in EQT. Our data shows that T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Wellington Management Group LLP and The Vanguard Group, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 9.0%.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以共同行使重大權力。我們注意到對沖基金在EQt中並沒有有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,t. Rowe Price Group,Inc是持有14%流通股的最大股東。第二和第三大股東是惠靈頓管理集團有限公司和The Vanguard Group,Inc.,他們擁有9.0%的股份。
We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
內部人員擁有佛山藍火箭電子股份有限公司的重要比例。內部人員在這家69億元人民幣的企業中持有25億元人民幣的股份,看到內部人員如此投資是很好的。如果這些內部人員最近一直在購買,那就值得檢查。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。
Insider Ownership Of EQT
EQT內部所有權分析
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of EQT Corporation in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$120m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的數據表明,內部人員以自己的名義擁有不到1%的EQt股份。由於規模如此之大,我們不希望內部人員持有大量股票。總的來說,他們擁有1.2億美元的股票。看到至少有一些內部所有權總是好的,但可能值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在清倉。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司17%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。雖然該群體不能決定事情的走向,但肯定會在公司的運營方面產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for EQT (of which 1 doesn't sit too well with us!) you should know about.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體的情況非常重要,但有其他更重要的因素。 例如風險。每個公司都有它們,我們發現EQt存在4個警示信號(其中1個不太好),您應該了解這些警示信號。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。