share_log

CITIC Offshore Helicopter Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:000099) Market Cap Dropped CN¥892m Last Week; Individual Investors Bore the Brunt

CITIC Offshore Helicopter Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:000099) Market Cap Dropped CN¥892m Last Week; Individual Investors Bore the Brunt

中信海直股份有限公司(SZSE:000099)的市值上週下降了89200萬人民幣;個人投資者承受了主要壓力。
Simply Wall St ·  08/18 21:12

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over CITIC Offshore Helicopter by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 17 shareholders own 46% of the company
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 個人投資者對中信海直的重要控制意味着普通公衆在管理和治理決策上擁有更多權力。
  • 前17名股東擁有公司46%的股權。
  • 通過公司過去的業績數據和股權研究,人們可以更好地評估一家公司的未來表現。

A look at the shareholders of CITIC Offshore Helicopter Co., Ltd. (SZSE:000099) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 54% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

通過觀察中信海直股份有限公司(SZSE:000099)的股東,我們可以知道哪個群體最具影響力。我們可以看到個人投資者擁有公司54%的股權,換句話說,該群體在公司的投資中有最多(或最少)的收益。

As market cap fell to CN¥12b last week, individual investors would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

由於市值在上週降至120億元人民幣,個體投資者將面臨該公司的最高虧損,而其他股東則沒有這麼大的虧損。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about CITIC Offshore Helicopter.

讓我們仔細觀察一下不同類型的股東對中信海直能告訴我們些什麼。

big
SZSE:000099 Ownership Breakdown August 19th 2024
深交所:000099股權分佈於2024年8月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CITIC Offshore Helicopter?

機構持股情況能告訴我們些什麼關於中信海直?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in CITIC Offshore Helicopter. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see CITIC Offshore Helicopter's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在中信海直擁有相當大的股份。這表明專業投資者之間的可信度較高。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構持有某隻股票時,存在它們參與的風險可能過於集中。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個方面可能會競相快速拋售股票。對於一家沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到中信海直的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事還有更多內容。

big
SZSE:000099 Earnings and Revenue Growth August 19th 2024
2024年8月19日,深交所:000099 出現了盈利和營業收入的增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in CITIC Offshore Helicopter. The company's largest shareholder is CITIC Group Corporation, with ownership of 30%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 2.6% by the third-largest shareholder.

對中信海直來說,對沖基金沒有很多股份。公司最大的股東是中信集團,持股比例爲30%。爲了更好的理解,第二大股東持有約8.5%的流通股份,第三大股東持有2.6%的股份。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 17 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

進一步研究我們的所有權數據顯示,前17名股東總共持有不到註冊資本的一半,這表明有一大批小股東,沒有任何單一股東擁有大多數股權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

上海阿拉丁生物化學技術股份有限公司的內部人員擁有重要比例,內部人員在這家總價值27億人民幣的公司中持有12億人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有很多股份。您可以單擊此處查看他們是否進行了買賣。

Insider Ownership Of CITIC Offshore Helicopter

中信海直的內部股權持有情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.

我們的數據無法確認董事會成員個人持有股份。由於我們不能獲悉內部持股情況,因此可能存在缺失數據。因此,評估首席執行官的報酬和任期很有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 54% stake in CITIC Offshore Helicopter, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

通常是個人投資者的普通大衆持有中信海直股份有限公司54%的股份,這表明它是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。這種所有權規模賦予了普通大衆投資者一定的集體權力。他們可以且可能會影響高管薪酬、股息政策和擬議的業務收購決策。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 8.5% stake in CITIC Offshore Helicopter. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股權投資公司持有中信海直8.5% 的股份。這表明他們在關鍵政策決策方面可能具有影響力。一些投資者可能會因此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權投資有時能夠鼓勵制定戰略,幫助市場認識到該公司的價值。或者,這些股東可能在上市後退出投資。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 31%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司31%的股份。這可能值得更深入地研究。如果相關方,如內部人員,在其中一個私人公司中擁有利益,則應在年度報告中披露。私人公司可能還對該公司有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand CITIC Offshore Helicopter better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for CITIC Offshore Helicopter you should know about.

總是值得考慮不同的股東群體,當然爲了更好地了解中信海直,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,考慮風險。每個公司都有風險,我們發現中信海直有一個警示信號,你應該知道。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論