share_log

A Great Week That Adds to Federated Hermes, Inc.'s (NYSE:FHI) One-year Returns, Institutional Investors Who Own 83% Must Be Happy

A Great Week That Adds to Federated Hermes, Inc.'s (NYSE:FHI) One-year Returns, Institutional Investors Who Own 83% Must Be Happy

一個偉大的一週,爲聯合赫爾墨斯公司(紐交所:FHI)一年的回報增添-持有83%的機構投資者必定感到高興
Simply Wall St ·  08/19 06:50

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Federated Hermes' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 13 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構持有大量股份意味着Federated Hermes股票價格容易受到其交易行爲的影響。
  • 前13名股東佔該公司50%的股份。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

If you want to know who really controls Federated Hermes, Inc. (NYSE:FHI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 83% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道真正控制Federated Hermes, Inc. (紐交所:FHI)的是誰,那麼您需要看其股權登記的構成。持有83%股權的機構是該公司最大的股東。換句話說,該群體會面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Last week's 3.0% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 6.7%.

上週3.0%的漲幅意味着機構投資者在公司展示強勁長期趨勢的同時處於積極的一面。上週的收益進一步提高了目前股東的一年回報率,達到了6.7%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Federated Hermes.

讓我們更加仔細地看看不同股東類型能告訴我們哪些有關Federated Hermes的信息。

big
NYSE:FHI Ownership Breakdown August 19th 2024
紐交所:FHI所有權分佈2024年8月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Federated Hermes?

機構持股告訴我們關於Federated Hermes的什麼信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Federated Hermes does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Federated Hermes' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,Federated Hermes確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的相當一部分股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師們已經看過這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但是,就像任何其他人一樣,他們也可能錯了。如果多個機構同時改變對某一股票的看法,其股價可能會快速下跌。因此,值得看看下面Federated Hermes的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:FHI Earnings and Revenue Growth August 19th 2024
紐交所:FHI營收增長和收益增長2024年8月19日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Federated Hermes is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 11%. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and FMR LLC holds about 7.0% of the company stock.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會的決策。Federated Hermes不屬於對沖基金。該公司最大的股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有11%的股份。BlackRock, Inc.是第二大股東,持有普通股的11%,而FMR LLC持有該公司股票的約7.0%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

在我們的所有權數字中仔細看看,前13名股東擁有的股權合計爲50%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Federated Hermes

Federated Hermes的內部股權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We can see that insiders own shares in Federated Hermes, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$111m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以看到,內部人士持有Federated Hermes, Inc的股份。這是一個相當大的公司,因此看到某些潛在有意義的聯盟是正面的。在這種情況下,他們擁有大約1.11億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間存在利益的共同點。儘管如此,檢查一下這些內部人是否一直在出售股票可能是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Federated Hermes. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有Federated Hermes的13%的股份。這種所有權雖然相當可觀,但如果決策和其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Federated Hermes you should know about.

儘管值得考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,注意風險。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現了Federated Hermes的1個警示信號,您應該知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論