If EPS Growth Is Important To You, A. O. Smith (NYSE:AOS) Presents An Opportunity
If EPS Growth Is Important To You, A. O. Smith (NYSE:AOS) Presents An Opportunity
Investors are often guided by the idea of discovering 'the next big thing', even if that means buying 'story stocks' without any revenue, let alone profit. But as Peter Lynch said in One Up On Wall Street, 'Long shots almost never pay off.' While a well funded company may sustain losses for years, it will need to generate a profit eventually, or else investors will move on and the company will wither away.
即使購買'故事股'(沒有任何營業收入,更不用說盈利)也是爲了找到下一個大機會。但正如彼得·林奇在《華爾街上的贏家》中所說: 「幾乎不可能靠運氣取勝。」儘管充足資金的企業可能會連續多年遭受虧損,但最終肯定需要盈利,否則投資者將會撤出,企業將會衰敗。
So if this idea of high risk and high reward doesn't suit, you might be more interested in profitable, growing companies, like A. O. Smith (NYSE:AOS). While this doesn't necessarily speak to whether it's undervalued, the profitability of the business is enough to warrant some appreciation - especially if its growing.
如果您不喜歡高風險高回報,那麼您可能更感興趣的是像A.O.史密斯(紐交所:AOS)這樣的賺錢增長型企業。這並不能說明它是否被低估,但企業的盈利能力已經足夠讓人欣賞,特別是如果它能保持增長。
A. O. Smith's Earnings Per Share Are Growing
A.O.史密斯的每股收益正在增長
Generally, companies experiencing growth in earnings per share (EPS) should see similar trends in share price. Therefore, there are plenty of investors who like to buy shares in companies that are growing EPS. Over the last three years, A. O. Smith has grown EPS by 13% per year. That's a pretty good rate, if the company can sustain it.
通常來說,每股收益(EPS)增長的公司股價也會有類似的趨勢。因此,有許多投資者喜歡購買EPS增長的公司的股票。在過去三年中,A.O.史密斯的每股收益每年增長了13%。如果企業能夠維持這樣的增長率,那將是一個相當不錯的速度。
Careful consideration of revenue growth and earnings before interest and taxation (EBIT) margins can help inform a view on the sustainability of the recent profit growth. While we note A. O. Smith achieved similar EBIT margins to last year, revenue grew by a solid 5.1% to US$3.9b. That's progress.
仔細考慮營業收入增長和息稅前利潤率(EBIT)可以幫助了解最近利潤增長的可持續性。雖然我們注意到A.O.史密斯實現了與去年類似的EBIT利潤率,但營業收入增長了5.1%至39億美元。這是進步。
You can take a look at the company's revenue and earnings growth trend, in the chart below. To see the actual numbers, click on the chart.
您可以查看下圖中企業的營收和收益增長趨勢。要查看實際數字,請單擊圖表。
Of course the knack is to find stocks that have their best days in the future, not in the past. You could base your opinion on past performance, of course, but you may also want to check this interactive graph of professional analyst EPS forecasts for A. O. Smith.
當然,訣竅在於找到未來最好的股票,而不是過去最好的股票。當然,您可以基於過去的表現來發表意見,但您也可以查看A.O.史密斯的專業分析師EPS預測的交互式圖表。
Are A. O. Smith Insiders Aligned With All Shareholders?
A.O.史密斯的內部人員與所有股東保持一致嗎?
Since A. O. Smith has a market capitalisation of US$12b, we wouldn't expect insiders to hold a large percentage of shares. But we do take comfort from the fact that they are investors in the company. Indeed, they have a considerable amount of wealth invested in it, currently valued at US$108m. While that is a lot of skin in the game, we note this holding only totals to 0.9% of the business, which is a result of the company being so large. So despite their percentage holding being low, company management still have plenty of reasons to deliver the best outcomes for investors.
由於A.O.史密斯的市值爲120億美元,我們不會期望內部人士持有大部分股份。但我們確實從這個事實中獲得了一些安慰,即他們是公司的投資者。事實上,他們在公司中投資了相當大的財富,目前價值1,080萬美元。雖然這是大量的股份,但我們注意到,這個持股僅佔了公司的0.9%,這是因爲公司規模如此之大。因此,儘管他們持有的百分比較低,公司管理層仍有充分理由爲投資者提供最佳業績。
It's good to see that insiders are invested in the company, but are remuneration levels reasonable? A brief analysis of the CEO compensation suggests they are. The median total compensation for CEOs of companies similar in size to A. O. Smith, with market caps over US$8.0b, is around US$13m.
看到內部人員投資於公司是好事,但報酬水平是否合理呢?對CEO薪酬的簡要分析表明他們是合理的。與A.O.史密斯規模相似,市值超過80億美元的公司的CEO的中位總薪酬約爲1300萬美元。
The A. O. Smith CEO received US$8.8m in compensation for the year ending December 2023. That seems pretty reasonable, especially given it's below the median for similar sized companies. CEO compensation is hardly the most important aspect of a company to consider, but when it's reasonable, that gives a little more confidence that leadership are looking out for shareholder interests. It can also be a sign of a culture of integrity, in a broader sense.
A.O.史密斯的首席執行官在2023年12月結束的年度獲得了880萬美元的薪酬。這似乎相當合理,特別是考慮到它低於類似規模公司的中位數。CEO薪酬並不是要考慮的最重要的方面,但當它是合理的時候,這會增加一點領導層考慮股東利益的信心。這也可以是廣義上誠信文化的一個標誌。
Is A. O. Smith Worth Keeping An Eye On?
A.O.史密斯是否值得關注?
As previously touched on, A. O. Smith is a growing business, which is encouraging. The fact that EPS is growing is a genuine positive for A. O. Smith, but the pleasant picture gets better than that. With a meaningful level of insider ownership, and reasonable CEO pay, a reasonable mind might conclude that this is one stock worth watching. While we've looked at the quality of the earnings, we haven't yet done any work to value the stock. So if you like to buy cheap, you may want to check if A. O. Smith is trading on a high P/E or a low P/E, relative to its industry.
正如之前提到的,A.O.史密斯是一個不斷成長的企業,這是令人鼓舞的。每股收益增長是A.O.史密斯的真正優點,但美好的局面還不止於此。憑藉意義深遠的內部持股水平和合理的CEO薪酬,一個理性的思維可能會得出這是一個值得關注的股票。儘管我們已經考慮了收益的質量,但我們還沒有對這支股票進行估值。因此,如果您喜歡購買便宜的股票,則可以查看A.O.史密斯相對於其行業是高P / E還是低P / E的情況。
While opting for stocks without growing earnings and absent insider buying can yield results, for investors valuing these key metrics, here is a carefully selected list of companies in the US with promising growth potential and insider confidence.
儘管不增長收益且沒有內部人士購買的股票可能會有回報,但對於重視這些關鍵指標的投資者來說,以下是在美國具有潛在增長和內部人士信心的經過慎重篩選的公司列表。
Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction.
請注意,本文討論的內部交易是指在相關司法管轄區中報告的交易。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。