share_log

Merck (NYSE:MRK) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet

Merck (NYSE:MRK) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet

默沙東(紐交所:MRK)擁有相當健康的資產負債表。
Simply Wall St ·  08/19 10:17

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. As with many other companies Merck & Co., Inc. (NYSE:MRK) makes use of debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

作爲一名投資者,有人認爲波動性而非債務是風險考量的最佳方式,但禾倫•巴菲特曾說過,「波動性遠非風險的同義詞。」因此,當你考慮任何特定股票的風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會導致公司破產。和許多其他公司一樣,默沙東製藥股份有限公司(NYSE:MRK)使用債務。但更重要的問題是:這筆債務產生了多大的風險?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

一般來說,僅當公司無法輕鬆償還債務時,債務才會成爲真正的問題,無論是通過籌集資本還是通過自身現金流。如果情況變得非常糟糕,放貸人可以控制業務。然而,更常見的(但仍然昂貴)情況是公司必須以便宜的股票價格稀釋股東權益,只是爲了控制債務。當然,債務的好處在於它經常代表便宜的資本,尤其是當它用高回報率的再投資替換公司稀釋股份時。當我們考慮公司使用債務時,我們首先查看現金和債務。

What Is Merck's Debt?

默沙東的債務是什麼?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Merck had US$37.8b in debt in June 2024; about the same as the year before. However, it also had US$11.4b in cash, and so its net debt is US$26.4b.

下面的圖表顯示,截至2024年6月,默沙東有378億美元的債務,與前年相當。但它也有114億美元的現金,所以它的淨債務爲264億美元。

big
NYSE:MRK Debt to Equity History August 19th 2024
NYSE:MRK債務股本歷史2024年8月19日

How Strong Is Merck's Balance Sheet?

默沙東的資產負債表有多強?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Merck had liabilities of US$26.1b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$42.9b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had US$11.4b in cash and US$13.0b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$44.7b.

根據最後一份披露的資產負債表,默沙東有261億美元的負債在12個月內到期,429億美元的負債在12個月後到期。與此相抵消的是,它有114億美元的現金和130億美元的應收賬款,在12個月內到期。因此,它的負債超過了其現金和(短期)應收賬款的總和447億美元。

Since publicly traded Merck shares are worth a very impressive total of US$288.1b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.

由於公開交易的默沙東股票總價值爲2881億美元,因此這個負債水平似乎不太可能構成重大威脅。但是,有足夠的負債,我們肯定建議股東繼續關注資產負債表變化。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

我們使用兩個主要的比率來告訴我們相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),而第二個是其利潤前利息和稅(EBIT)覆蓋其利息費用的次數(或其利息覆蓋率,簡稱)。因此,我們考慮與折舊和攤銷費用相關的盈利以及沒有相關費用的盈利相對於債務水平。

Merck has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 1.1. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 20.7 times over. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. Merck's EBIT was pretty flat over the last year, but that shouldn't be an issue given the it doesn't have a lot of debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Merck can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

默沙東的淨債務/EBITDA比率僅爲1.1。它的EBIT對利息支出的覆蓋率超過了20.7倍。因此,我們對其超級保守的債務使用感到相當放心。默沙東的EBIT在過去一年中保持基本不變,但由於它沒有太多債務,這不應該成爲問題。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但最終業務的未來盈利能力將決定默沙東是否能夠隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果你關注未來,可以查看這份免費的分析師盈利預測報告。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Merck recorded free cash flow worth 65% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

最後,一家企業需要自由現金流來償還債務。會計利潤並不足以達到這一目的。因此,邏輯上的步驟是看看EBIT中有多少部分與實際的自由現金流匹配。在最近的三年中,默沙東記錄的自由現金流價值相當於其EBIT的65%,這是正常水平,因爲自由現金流不包括利息和稅。這些現金意味着它可以在希望時減輕債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

Happily, Merck's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And the good news does not stop there, as its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow also supports that impression! Taking all this data into account, it seems to us that Merck takes a pretty sensible approach to debt. That means they are taking on a bit more risk, in the hope of boosting shareholder returns. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Merck you should be aware of.

令人高興的是,默沙東令人印象深刻的利息覆蓋率意味着它已經掌握了解決債務問題的主動權。而好消息不止於此,因爲它還將EBIT轉換爲自由現金流的能力也支持了這一印象!綜合所有這些數據,我們認爲默沙東對待債務的方式相當明智。這意味着他們正在承擔更多的風險,希望提高股東回報率。毋庸置疑,我們從資產負債表中了解到有關債務的大部分信息。然而,並不是所有的投資風險都來自資產負債表-遠非如此。案例證明:我們已發現1個關於默沙東的警告信號,您應該知道。

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

當然,如果您是那種喜歡購買沒有債務負擔的股票的投資者,那麼不要猶豫,立即發現我們獨家的淨現金增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論