PCCW Limited's (HKG:8) Top Owners Are Public Companies With 41% Stake, While 41% Is Held by Individual Investors
PCCW Limited's (HKG:8) Top Owners Are Public Companies With 41% Stake, While 41% Is Held by Individual Investors
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over PCCW by public companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 4 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 公衆公司對電訊盈科的顯著控制意味着普通大衆在管理和治理相關決策方面具有更大的影響力。
- 前4大股東擁有公司的50%的股份。
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
Every investor in PCCW Limited (HKG:8) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that public companies own the lion's share in the company with 41% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
每位電訊盈科(adr)的投資者都應該注意最有力的股東群體。我們可以看到,公衆公司佔公司的大部分股份,擁有41%的所有權。換句話說,該群體面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And individual investors on the other hand have a 41% ownership in the company.
另一方面,個人投資者擁有公司的41%所有權。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of PCCW, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討電訊盈科的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240820/0-0ac6eeda32aaa23dcf7fa7d0ea498b8c-0-5577fccb9dc043b002ecbddfbd8aeb27.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About PCCW?
機構持股對電訊盈科有何啓示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
PCCW already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of PCCW, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
電訊盈科已經進入了機構持股名單。事實上,它們在公司中擁有一定的股權。這意味着這些機構的分析師已經關注了這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也有可能犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一隻股票,大跌股價並不罕見。因此,值得查看電訊盈科的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素要考慮。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240820/0-0ac6eeda32aaa23dcf7fa7d0ea498b8c-1-db76888d62ec68ae79c38c190b5fe4fa.png/big)
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in PCCW. Pacific Century Regional Developments Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 23% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 18% and 6.9% of the stock. Tzar Kai Li, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.
我們注意到,對電訊盈科來說,對沖基金的投資並不重要。盈科亞洲拓展是目前公司的最大股東,持有公司流通股的23%;而第二大和第三大股東持有的股票各約佔18%和6.9%。同時,第三大股東扎凱麗還擔任董事會主席一職。
On looking further, we found that 50% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
進一步觀察發現,前4大股東持有50%的股份。換句話說,這些股東在公司決策中具有重要的發言權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of PCCW
電訊盈科股權架構中內部人持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in PCCW Limited. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around HK$2.3b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們可以報告說,內部人員確實持有電訊盈科有限公司的股份。公司相當大,因此看到一些具有潛在意義的利益相關者是一個積極的信號。從目前的價格來看,他們擁有價值約23億港元的股份。看到內部人員擁有這樣的投資是令人欣慰的。您可以在這裏查看是否有內部人員最近的買入行爲。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 41% stake in PCCW. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
持有電訊盈科的普通大衆,通常是個人投資者,持有公司的41%的股份。雖然這個群體不一定能決定決策,但它確實對公司的運營產生了很大的影響。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
We can see that public companies hold 41% of the PCCW shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
我們可以看到,公衆公司持有電訊盈科發行的41%的股份。這可能是一種戰略利益,兩個公司可能存在相關的商業利益。也有可能是它們已經被拆分出來了。這個持股可能值得進一步調查。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand PCCW better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with PCCW (at least 1 which doesn't sit too well with us) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
思考公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地理解電訊盈科,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,始終存在的投資風險問題。我們已經確定了電訊盈科的三個警告信號(至少有一個不大好),了解這些信號應該是您的投資過程的一部分。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。