share_log

Private Companies Are GCL Energy Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:002015) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥601m

Private Companies Are GCL Energy Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:002015) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥601m

私營企業是協鑫能科有限公司(SZSE:002015)的最大股東,在市值下跌6.01億元后受到衝擊。
Simply Wall St ·  08/20 20:21

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over GCL Energy TechnologyLtd by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 3 shareholders own 54% of the company
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 私人公司對於協鑫能科具有重要的控制權,這意味着大衆在管理和治理決策上有更多的影響力。
  • 前三大股東擁有該公司54%的股份。
  • 公司過去的業績以及所有權數據,有助於形成對業務前景的強烈想法。

If you want to know who really controls GCL Energy Technology Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:002015), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 60% to be precise, is private companies. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想知道誰真正控制着協鑫能科股份有限公司(SZSE:002015),那麼您就得看看其股權登記簿的構成。持有該公司股份數量最多的集團,準確來說佔大約60%,是私人公司。換句話說,這個集團對其對該公司的投資可能獲得最多的利益(或遭受最大的損失)。

As a result, private companies as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥601m.

因此,上週私營企業集體市值下降了CN¥60100萬導致了最大的虧損。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of GCL Energy TechnologyLtd.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了協鑫能科股份有限公司的不同所有權群體。

big
SZSE:002015 Ownership Breakdown August 21st 2024
SZSE:002015所有權比例分佈 2024年8月21日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About GCL Energy TechnologyLtd?

機構投資者的持股情況對協鑫能科股份有限公司有什麼影響?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

GCL Energy TechnologyLtd already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of GCL Energy TechnologyLtd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

協鑫能科股份有限公司已經有機構投資者在股東名冊上。實際上,他們在該公司擁有可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者中存在一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構投資者有時也會做出糟糕的投資決策,就像其他人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌是常見的現象。因此,值得檢查協鑫能科股份有限公司以往的收入軌跡(見下圖)。當然,還要考慮其他因素。

big
SZSE:002015 Earnings and Revenue Growth August 21st 2024
深圳證券交易所:002015年8月21日的收益和營業收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in GCL Energy TechnologyLtd. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Asia Pacific Energy Fund Limited with 44% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.5% and 5.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我們注意到對於協鑫能科有意義的投資不多於所有基金類型。看看我們的數據可以看到,最大的股東是亞太能源基金有限公司,持有已發行股份的44%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的5.5%和5.0%。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 54% stake.

擁有36%股份的總公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對深圳凱中精密技術有一定的影響力。儘管這種所有權的大小可能不足以在政策決策中左右決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。研究分析師的看法也可以達到同樣的效果。股票的分析師覆蓋率很低,但不多。因此,可以有更多的空間來增加其覆蓋範圍。

Insider Ownership Of GCL Energy TechnologyLtd

協鑫能科的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.

我們注意到我們的數據並沒有顯示任何董事會成員擁有股份。董事會成員至少擁有一些個人持倉是不尋常的,因此我們的數據可能有缺陷。下一步是檢查CEO的薪酬水平。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 33% stake in GCL Energy TechnologyLtd. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有協鑫能科有限公司33%的股份。雖然這個群體不能決定一切,但肯定對公司的運行產生了實際影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 60%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到私人公司持有已發行股份的60%。單憑這一事實很難得出結論,因此值得研究誰擁有那些私人公司。有時,內部人員或其他相關方通過獨立的私人公司持有公共公司的股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for GCL Energy TechnologyLtd you should be aware of, and 1 of them is potentially serious.

我發現了一個看看誰擁有一家公司非常有趣的事情。但是要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。舉個例子:我們注意到協鑫能科有2個警告信號,你應該注意其中一個可能很嚴重。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論