Chengdu RML Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301050) Market Cap Dropped CN¥382m Last Week; Individual Investors Bore the Brunt
Chengdu RML Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301050) Market Cap Dropped CN¥382m Last Week; Individual Investors Bore the Brunt
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Chengdu RML Technology by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 14 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- 29% of Chengdu RML Technology is held by insiders
- 個人投資者對成都瑞邁拉科技的重大控制意味着普通公衆對管理和治理相關決策有更多的影響力。
- 共有14名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,佔有50%的所有權。
- 29%的成都瑞邁拉科技由內部人持有。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Chengdu RML Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301050), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 46% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
爲了了解誰真正掌控着成都瑞邁拉科技股份有限公司(SZSE:301050),了解公司的所有權結構是很重要的。個體投資者持有46%的股份,是公司中最大的股東。換句話說,這個團體從他們對公司的投資中可能獲得最多(或損失最多)的利益。
While the holdings of individual investors took a hit after last week's 4.9% price drop, insiders with their 29% also suffered.
個人投資者的持股在上週下跌4.9%後受到了打擊,持股29%的內部人士也遭受了損失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Chengdu RML Technology.
在下圖中,我們放大了成都銳邁科技的不同持股集團。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240821/0-3fe0e3d3c3971ef883acac853af49e3b-0-daaf8ba9fa4e414ea15ccc0f5c296605.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chengdu RML Technology?
機構所有權對成都銳邁科技有何指示?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Chengdu RML Technology. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Chengdu RML Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
如您所見,機構投資者在成都銳邁科技中擁有相當大的股權。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價大幅下跌是很常見的現象。因此,查看成都銳邁科技的過去盈利軌跡是很值得的(如下所示)。當然,還需要考慮其他因素。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240821/0-3fe0e3d3c3971ef883acac853af49e3b-1-7809a2ddce19cec30adc4c529c3c2010.png/big)
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Chengdu RML Technology. The company's largest shareholder is Jieru Deng, with ownership of 20%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.1% and 4.8% of the stock.
對成都RML科技而言,對沖基金並不持有太多股份。該公司最大的股東是鄧傑如,持有20%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約9.1%和4.8%的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 14 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前14名股東合計持有該公司的50%股權,表明沒有單一股東對該公司有重大控制權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以了解風向正在往哪裏吹。雖然有一些分析師對該股票進行了覆蓋,但隨着時間的推移,它可能仍然會變得更加知名。
Insider Ownership Of Chengdu RML Technology
成都RML科技內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Chengdu RML Technology Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥2.2b worth of shares in the CN¥7.5b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起來內部人員擁有成都RML科技有限公司的很大比例的股份。內部人員在這個價值爲75億人民幣的公司中擁有22億人民幣的股份,這相當有意義。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。您可以在這裏查看是否有內部人員最近有買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 46% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Chengdu RML Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
佔股46%的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對成都RML科技有一定的影響力。雖然這種持股比例可能不足以左右政策決策的結果,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 12%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有該公司12%的股份。僅憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究一下這些私營公司的所有者是誰。有時候內部人員或者其他相關方可能通過一個單獨的私營公司持有公共公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Chengdu RML Technology has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
查看公司股東的具體情況非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。以風險爲例 - 成都RML科技有一個警示標誌,我們認爲你應該知道。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。