share_log

The Recent 33% Gain Must Have Brightened Chief Scientific Officer Yun Liu's Week, Graphjet Technology's (NASDAQ:GTI) Most Bullish Insider

The Recent 33% Gain Must Have Brightened Chief Scientific Officer Yun Liu's Week, Graphjet Technology's (NASDAQ:GTI) Most Bullish Insider

最近33%的漲幅必定讓Graphjet Technology (納斯達克:GTI)的首席科學官劉贇的一週變得更加光明
Simply Wall St ·  08/21 06:45

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant insider control over Graphjet Technology implies vested interests in company growth
  • 58% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • Graphjet Technology重要的內部控制暗示着對公司增長的利益關係
  • 前三大股東持有業務的58%。
  • 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Graphjet Technology (NASDAQ:GTI), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 53% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解Graphjet Technology (納斯達克:GTI)誰真正掌控,重要的是要了解公司的所有權結構。而持有最大股份的集團是個人內部股東,擁有53%的所有權。也就是說,如果股票漲了,這個集團將獲益最多(或者如果出現下跌,將蒙受最大損失)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit US$280m market cap following a 33% gain in the stock.

結果,內部人員上週得分最高,公司股票上漲33%,市值達到2800萬美元。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Graphjet Technology.

在下圖中,我們放大了Graphjet Technology的不同所有權群體。

1724236662017
NasdaqGM:GTI Ownership Breakdown August 21st 2024
納斯達克GM:GTI所有權分析2024年8月21日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Graphjet Technology?

機構投資者缺失對Graphjet Technology有什麼影響?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

我們不會看到機構投資者持有非常高風險、交易較少或非常小的公司的股票。雖然有時會看到大公司沒有機構在註冊表上,但這並不是特別普遍的情況。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Graphjet Technology's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

爲什麼機構不持有某隻股票有多種解釋。最常見的是,該公司相對於管理的資金規模太小,所以機構不願意對該公司進行詳細的研究。另一方面,專業投資者避免購買某隻股票可能是因爲他們認爲這不是他們投資的最佳選擇。Graphjet Technology的盈利和營業收入記錄(如下圖),可能對機構投資者沒有足夠的吸引力--或者他們可能沒有仔細研究過該業務。

1724236665471
NasdaqGM:GTI Earnings and Revenue Growth August 21st 2024
GTI的營收和收入增長於2024年8月21日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Graphjet Technology. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Graphjet Technology's case, its Chief Scientific Officer, Yun Liu, is the largest shareholder, holding 25% of shares outstanding. Suria Suskes Engineering Sdn Bhd is the second largest shareholder owning 19% of common stock, and Hooi Lim holds about 14% of the company stock. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Hooi Lim is also a Chairman of the Board, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders. In addition, we found that Ping Wei Lee, the CEO has 6.1% of the shares allocated to their name.

我們注意到對於Graphjet Technology,對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。因爲行動勝於言辭,在公司內部擁有大量股權的內部人士被認爲是一個好跡象。在Graphjet Technology的情況下,其首席科學官劉雲是最大的股東,持有25%的流通股份。Suria Suskes Engineering Sdn Bhd是第二大股東,持有19%的普通股,而Hooi Lim持有公司股份的14%。有趣的是,第三大股東Hooi Lim也是董事會主席,再次表明公司的高級股東擁有強大的內部所有權。此外,我們發現CEO李平偉名下分配了6.1%的股份。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 58% stake.

股東登記簿的更詳細研究向我們展示了前三位股東擁有58%的股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

普通公衆持有北方銅業的23%股份。雖然這個群體不能決定公司的命運,但它肯定會對公司運營方式產生真正的影響。

Insider Ownership Of Graphjet Technology

Graphjet Technology的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Graphjet Technology. This gives them effective control of the company. Given it has a market cap of US$280m, that means they have US$148m worth of shares. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

根據我們的信息,內部持有Graphjet Technology超過一半的股份。這使他們有效控制着公司。這家公司的市值爲28000萬美元,這意味着他們擁有14800萬美元的股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個積極的因素,顯示與股東利益的強烈關聯。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否在買賣股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in Graphjet Technology. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在Graphjet Technology中持有28%的股份。雖然這個群體不能決定事情,但它確實對公司的運營有着實質性的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 19%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司股份的19%。私營公司可能是相關方。有時內部人員通過私營公司持有公共公司的利益,而不是作爲個人。雖然很難得出任何大膽的結論,但它值得作爲進一步研究的領域加以注意。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Graphjet Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 5 warning signs for Graphjet Technology you should be aware of.

始終值得考慮公司股票的不同股東群體。然而,要更好地了解Graphjet Technology,我們需要考慮其他許多因素。譬如,我們已經發現了5個Graphjet Technology的風險警示信號,你應該注意。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然,這可能不是最好的購買股票。因此,查看這份免費免費的有趣公司列表可能會有所幫助。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論