Private Equity Firms Are Redwire Corporation's (NYSE:RDW) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by US$57m Last Week
Private Equity Firms Are Redwire Corporation's (NYSE:RDW) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by US$57m Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Redwire by private equity firms implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The largest shareholder of the company is AE Industrial Partners, LP with a 54% stake
- Institutional ownership in Redwire is 13%
- 股權投資公司對Redwire的重要控制意味着普通公衆有更多影響管理和治理決策的權力
- 該公司最大的股東是AE Industrial Partners,LP,持有54%的股份
- Redwire的機構持股比例爲13%
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Redwire Corporation (NYSE:RDW), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private equity firms with 61% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正掌控Redwire Corporation(NYSE:RDW),了解該業務的所有權結構很重要。擁有最大部分股份的是持有61%股權的股權投資公司。換句話說,該集團在其對該公司的投資中將獲得最多(或損失最多)的回報。
Clearly, private equity firms benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by US$57m last week.
顯然,私募股權公司是上週市值增長了5700萬美元后收益最多的。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Redwire, beginning with the chart below.
現在讓我們深入了解Redwire的每種所有者,從下面的圖表開始。
![1724238715109](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240821/42665335-0-06f7f6680dde07a11bcb0a8b6efbfc1f.webp/bigjpg)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Redwire?
機構所有權對我們對Redwire有什麼啓示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Redwire does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Redwire's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到Redwire確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的大部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過該股票並且他們喜歡它。但是和其他人一樣,他們也可能犯錯。如果多家機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,看看Redwire的歷史收益情況是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
![1724238716431](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240821/42665335-1-b4d7b7071df1c953721a80b930d3ac24.webp/bigjpg)
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Redwire. The company's largest shareholder is AE Industrial Partners, LP, with ownership of 54%. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. Genesis Park Management LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 7.1% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 2.2% of the company stock.
我們注意到對於Redwire來說,對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。該公司最大的股東是AE Industrial Partners, LP,持有54%的股份。這意味着他們對公司的未來有主導控制的利益。Genesis Park Management LLC是第二大股東,持有7.1%的普通股,BlackRock, Inc.持有大約2.2%的公司股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Redwire
Redwire的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Redwire Corporation. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$13m worth of the US$460m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
股東們可能會對得知內部人在Redwire Corporation持有股份感興趣。作爲個人,內部人共同持有這家價值4.6億美元公司的價值爲1300萬美元的股份。看到內部人有一些投資是好事,但最好還是查一下這些內部人是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 23% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通公衆,包括零售投資者,擁有該公司的23%股份,因此不容易被忽視。儘管佔有的股份較大,但如果決策不與其他大股東保持一致,這家公司的政策可能無法改變。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With a stake of 61%, private equity firms could influence the Redwire board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
私募股權公司持有61%的股份,可能會對Redwire董事會產生影響。有些人可能會喜歡這一點,因爲私募股權有時是激進派,他們會對管理層負責。但有時私募股權也會拋售,把公司上市。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Redwire better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Redwire that you should be aware of before investing here.
始終值得考慮公司中持有股票的不同群體。但要更好地了解Redwire,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,在投資這裏之前,我們發現了2個Redwire的預警信號,您應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。