Corteva, Inc.'s (NYSE:CTVA) One-year Returns Climbed After Last Week's 3.6% Gain, Institutional Investors Must Be Happy
Corteva, Inc.'s (NYSE:CTVA) One-year Returns Climbed After Last Week's 3.6% Gain, Institutional Investors Must Be Happy
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Corteva's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 17 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 前17名股東擁有該公司的50%股份。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Corteva, Inc. (NYSE:CTVA), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 85% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
爲了了解Corteva,Inc. (NYSE:CTVA)真正的控制者,了解該企業的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,機構佔據了該公司85%的所有權。換句話說,該機構面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$1.3b in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 9.9%.
上週道富銀行的市值增加了13億美元,對機構投資者來說情況正在好轉。上週的收益還將進一步提升股東的一年回報率,目前爲9.9%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Corteva.
讓我們仔細看一下,不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於corteva的一些信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Corteva?
機構持股告訴我們關於corteva的一些信息
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Corteva does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Corteva's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到corteva確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的一大部分股票。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會出現糟糕的投資,就像每個人都會一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對一家股票的看法,可能會導致股價迅速下跌。因此值得查看corteva以下的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Corteva is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.8% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.8% of the company stock.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有超過一半的公司股份,因此他們可以共同行使重大權力。Corteva不是由對沖基金持有的。我們的數據顯示,The Vanguard Group,Inc.是最大的股東,持有11%的流通股份。BlackRock,Inc.是第二大股東,擁有7.8%的普通股,而道富銀行全球投資者,Inc.持有公司股份約4.8%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 17 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前17名股東在該公司擁有50%的持股,這意味着沒有單一股東對公司擁有顯著的控制力。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Corteva
Corteva的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that Corteva, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$44m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的信息顯示,Corteva, Inc.內部人員持有公司不到1%的股份。作爲一個如此龐大的公司,我們不會指望內部人員持有股票的比例很大。他們共持有4400萬美元的股份。看到至少有一些內部人員持有股份總是件好事,但值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在拋售。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 15% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Corteva. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
擁有15%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成的普通公衆對Corteva具有一定的影響力。雖然這一持股規模可能不足以左右政策決定的結果,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Corteva better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Corteva , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
在考慮一家公司的股東時,考慮不同的群體總是值得的。但是要更好地了解Corteva,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,投資風險這個永恒的威脅。我們已經發現了Corteva的一個警示標誌,並且了解它們應該是你的投資過程的一部分。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。