share_log

Following a 7.7% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (NYSE:EW) Institutional Owners

Following a 7.7% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (NYSE:EW) Institutional Owners

去年下降了7.7%後,最近的漲幅可能會讓愛德華生命科學公司(紐交所: EW)的機構所有者感到滿意
Simply Wall St ·  08/22 08:38

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Edwards Lifesciences' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 23 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 考慮到機構對該股票持有大量股份,愛德華生命科學的股價可能受到他們交易決定的影響
  • 23位最大股東持有General Mills公司50%的業務。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

If you want to know who really controls Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (NYSE:EW), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 86% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想知道誰真正控制着愛德華生命科學公司(紐交所:EW),那麼您需要看其股份登記的構成。擁有最大股份的是機構,持股比例爲86%。換句話說,這個群體可能會從對該公司的投資中獲得最大收益(或損失最大)。

Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 5.4% increase in the share price after a year of 7.7% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.

年底的 7.7% 損失後,機構投資者很可能對上週股價上漲 5.4% 感到歡迎,這可能意味着回報率可能開始走高。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Edwards Lifesciences, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解 Edwards Lifesciences 的每種股東,從下面的圖表開始。

1724330332121
NYSE:EW Ownership Breakdown August 22nd 2024
紐交所:EW 所有權拆分 2024 年 8 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Edwards Lifesciences?

機構持股情況告訴我們關於Edwards Lifesciences的什麼信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Edwards Lifesciences. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Edwards Lifesciences' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所見,機構投資者對 Edwards Lifesciences 持有相當數量的股份,這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下 Edwards Lifesciences 的下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

1724330333492
NYSE:EW Earnings and Revenue Growth August 22nd 2024
紐交所:EW盈利和營業收入增長2024年8月22日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Edwards Lifesciences is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 8.9% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.5% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.3% of the company stock.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有超過公司一半的股份,因此他們可以共同行使重大影響力。愛德華生命科學並非由對沖基金擁有。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是先鋒集團,持有公司8.9%的股份。黑石集團持有公司8.5%的普通股,道富銀行全球貨幣機構持有公司約4.3%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 23 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步了解,我們發現前23名股東在公司中擁有50%的股權,這表明沒有單一股東對該公司有顯著控制。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of Edwards Lifesciences

Edwards Lifesciences的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$371m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

根據我們的數據,內部持有的愛德華生命科學公司的股票不到1%。由於規模很大,我們不會期望內部持有大比例的股票。他們共持有37100萬美元的股票。可以點擊這裏查看內部人是否進行了買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Edwards Lifesciences. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

佔據13%的所有權的是廣大的公衆,主要是個人投資者,他們對愛德華生命科學的影響力有一定程度的影響。雖然這個群體不能直接掌握決策權,但肯定對公司的運行產生了真實的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論