share_log

Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (NASDAQ:PACB) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 85% Loss Over the Past Year

Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (NASDAQ:PACB) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 85% Loss Over the Past Year

近年來,太平洋生物科學(PACB)公司的機構所有者可能對最近的收益感到滿意,因爲在過去一年中股價下跌了85%。
Simply Wall St ·  08/22 09:05

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Pacific Biosciences of California's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,加州太平洋生物科學公司的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 共有7名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲53%
  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

Every investor in Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (NASDAQ:PACB) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 86% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

加州太平洋生物科學公司(納斯達克股票代碼:PACB)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲86%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Institutional investors would appreciate the 14% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 85%.

機構投資者將對上週股價上漲14%表示讚賞,因爲他們一年的虧損總額達到令人失望的85%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Pacific Biosciences of California, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究加州太平洋生物科學公司的每種所有者。

1724331937151
NasdaqGS:PACB Ownership Breakdown August 22nd 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:PACB 所有權明細 2024 年 8 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pacific Biosciences of California?

關於加州太平洋生物科學公司,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Pacific Biosciences of California. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Pacific Biosciences of California, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所見,機構投資者持有加州太平洋生物科學公司的大量股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看加州太平洋生物科學公司過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

1724331938497
NasdaqGS:PACB Earnings and Revenue Growth August 22nd 2024
NASDAQGS: PACB 收益和收入增長 2024 年 8 月 22 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Pacific Biosciences of California. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is ARK Investment Management LLC with 12% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.5% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 8.7% of the company stock.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對加州太平洋生物科學公司進行有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是方舟投資管理有限責任公司,其已發行股份的12%。Vanguard Group, Inc.是第二大股東,擁有9.5%的普通股,貝萊德公司持有該公司約8.7%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 53% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們又進行了一些挖掘,發現7位最大股東約佔登記冊的53%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Pacific Biosciences of California

加州太平洋生物科學公司的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.. It appears that the board holds about US$2.2m worth of stock. This compares to a market capitalization of US$406m. We generally like to see a board more invested. However it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有加州太平洋生物科學公司不到1%的股份。看來董事會持有價值約220萬美元的股票。相比之下,市值爲4.06億美元。我們通常希望看到董事會投入更多資金。但是,可能值得檢查這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Pacific Biosciences of California. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有加利福尼亞太平洋生物科學公司13%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Pacific Biosciences of California (at least 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向加州太平洋生物科學公司確定了3個警告信號(至少有1個讓我們有點不舒服),了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論