Shanghai Suochen Information Technology Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:688507) Insiders, Who Hold 39% of the Firm Would Be Disappointed by the Recent Pullback
Shanghai Suochen Information Technology Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:688507) Insiders, Who Hold 39% of the Firm Would Be Disappointed by the Recent Pullback
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant insider control over Shanghai Suochen Information TechnologyLtd implies vested interests in company growth
- 54% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- Institutions own 18% of Shanghai Suochen Information TechnologyLtd
- 上海索辰信息技術有限公司存在重要的內部控制,這意味着對公司的增長存在利益
- 前三大股東持有該企業54%的股份。
- 機構持有上海索辰信息技術有限公司的18%
Every investor in Shanghai Suochen Information Technology Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:688507) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 39% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
上海索辰信息技術有限公司的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。擁有該公司最多股份的群體,準確地說約佔39%,是個人內部人士。換句話說,該群體在公司投資中將獲得最大的利益(或損失)
And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 9.1%.
上週內部投資者遭受最大損失,隨着股票下跌了9.1%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shanghai Suochen Information TechnologyLtd, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解上海所臣信息科技有限公司的每一類所有者,首先從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Suochen Information TechnologyLtd?
機構所有權告訴我們上海所臣信息科技有限公司的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shanghai Suochen Information TechnologyLtd. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shanghai Suochen Information TechnologyLtd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所見,機構投資者在上海所臣信息科技有限公司擁有相當大的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資社區具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證,因爲他們有時也會出錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一隻股票,往往會導致股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查上海所臣信息科技有限公司的過去收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Shanghai Suochen Information TechnologyLtd. Hao Chen is currently the company's largest shareholder with 39% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.1% and 7.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
我們注意到,對於上海索臣信息科技有限公司,對沖基金沒有實質性投資。陳浩目前是公司最大的股東,持有39%的股份。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的8.1%和7.1%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前3大股東共控制了公司股份的一半以上,這意味着他們有相當大的權力來影響公司的決策。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Suochen Information TechnologyLtd
上海索臣信息科技股份有限公司的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Shanghai Suochen Information Technology Co.,Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥1.5b worth of shares in the CN¥3.7b company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
上海索塵信息科技有限公司的內部人士擁有相當大比例的股份。內部人士在這家市值達37億人民幣的公司中擁有15億人民幣的股份。這可能意味着創始人仍然擁有很多股份。您可以點擊這裏查看他們是否買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in Shanghai Suochen Information TechnologyLtd. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在上海索塵信息科技有限公司擁有20%的股權。雖然這個群體可能不能決定公司的方向,但肯定可以對公司的經營產生實質影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 22%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們可以看到私人公司擁有已發行股份的22%。僅憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,所以有必要了解誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人士或其他相關方通過單獨的私人公司持有上市公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Shanghai Suochen Information TechnologyLtd better, we need to consider many other factors.
思考不同的股東群體總是值得的。但要更好地理解上海索辰信息科技有限公司,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。