Following Recent Decline, Guangzhou Haoyang Electronic Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:300833) Top Shareholder CEO Weikai Jiang Sees Holdings Value Drop by 7.1%
Following Recent Decline, Guangzhou Haoyang Electronic Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:300833) Top Shareholder CEO Weikai Jiang Sees Holdings Value Drop by 7.1%
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant insider control over Guangzhou Haoyang ElectronicLtd implies vested interests in company growth
- Weikai Jiang owns 59% of the company
- Institutional ownership in Guangzhou Haoyang ElectronicLtd is 12%
- 廣州浩洋電子有限公司的重要內部控制意味着對公司增長有着既得利益。
- 魏凱江擁有該公司的59%
- 廣州浩洋電子有限公司的機構持股比例爲12%
Every investor in Guangzhou Haoyang Electronic Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:300833) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 70% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
廣州浩洋電子股份有限公司(SZSE:300833)的每一位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,個人內部人員擁有公司的70%的所有權。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲益最多(或者如果出現衰退,則損失最多)。
And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 7.1%.
上週,內部人遭受了最大的損失,因爲股票下跌了7.1%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Guangzhou Haoyang ElectronicLtd, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解廣州浩洋電子有限公司的每一種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Guangzhou Haoyang ElectronicLtd?
機構持股告訴我們廣州浩洋電子有限公司的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Guangzhou Haoyang ElectronicLtd already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Guangzhou Haoyang ElectronicLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
廣州浩洋電子有限公司已經有機構在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司擁有可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會犯錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在它們陷入'擁擠交易'的風險。當這樣的交易出問題時,多個方可能競相快速拋售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到廣州浩洋電子有限公司的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更多。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Guangzhou Haoyang ElectronicLtd. The company's CEO Weikai Jiang is the largest shareholder with 59% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. It's usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider with such skin in the game. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 2.5% by the third-largest shareholder.
對沖基金在浩洋股份沒有太多股份。該公司的CEO蔣偉凱是最大的股東,持有59%的流通股。擁有如此大的股份,我們推斷他們對公司未來有重要的控制權。當內部人士擁有大量股份時,通常被視爲一個好跡象,在這種情況下,我們很高興看到公司內部人士在這種遊戲中擁有如此多的股份。值得一提的是,第二大股東持有約11%的流通股,第三大股東持有2.5%的股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of Guangzhou Haoyang ElectronicLtd
浩洋股份的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
It seems that insiders own more than half the Guangzhou Haoyang Electronic Co.,Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. Given it has a market cap of CN¥4.7b, that means they have CN¥3.3b worth of shares. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起來內部持有的廣州浩洋電子有限公司股份超過了一半。 這給他們帶來了很大的權力。 考慮到它市值爲CN¥47億,這意味着他們擁有價值CN¥33億的股份。 看到這種程度的投資是很好的。 您可以在這裏檢查,看看這些內部人員最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
包括零售投資者在內的普通大衆擁有該公司16%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這種所有權的大小可能不足以使政策決策朝他們的方向傾斜,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Guangzhou Haoyang ElectronicLtd has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is significant) we think you should know about.
我覺得看到一家公司究竟由誰擁有是非常有趣的。 但要真正獲得洞察力,我們也需要考慮其他信息。 舉例來說風險 - 廣州浩洋電子有限公司股票有2個警示標誌(其中1個是重要的),我們認爲您應該知道。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。