share_log

CEO Huaigang Lei, Shanghai Ruking Technologies Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301525) Largest Shareholder Sees Value of Holdings Go Down 11% After Recent Drop

CEO Huaigang Lei, Shanghai Ruking Technologies Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301525) Largest Shareholder Sees Value of Holdings Go Down 11% After Recent Drop

華港雷首席執行官上海如箐科技股份有限公司(SZSE:301525)的最大股東,在最近的下跌之後,看到其持股的價值下降了11%。
Simply Wall St ·  08/22 20:20

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Shanghai Ruking Technologies' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 上海如金科技的重要內部持股表明了公司擴張的固有利益。
  • 前6名股東持有公司51%的股份。
  • 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。

A look at the shareholders of Shanghai Ruking Technologies Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301525) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 48% to be precise, is individual insiders. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看上海如金科技有限公司(SZSE:301525)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。公司中持有最多股份的群體,準確來說,約佔48%,是個人內部持股者。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下跌風險)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 11%.

上週,內部人士遭受了最大的損失,因爲該股票下跌了11%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shanghai Ruking Technologies, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們更深入地了解上海如昂科技的每種所有者類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。

1724372402758
SZSE:301525 Ownership Breakdown August 23rd 2024
SZSE:301525所有權分解2024年8月23日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Ruking Technologies?

機構持股給我們關於上海如昂科技的什麼樣的信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shanghai Ruking Technologies. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Shanghai Ruking Technologies' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在上海如昂科技中佔有相當大的股份。這可能意味着公司在投資界擁有一定的信譽。然而,對於依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證,最好保持警惕。他們有時候也會犯錯誤。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的觀點,你可能會看到股價急劇下跌。因此,值得看一下上海如昂科技的歷史收入數據。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

1724372403868
SZSE:301525 Earnings and Revenue Growth August 23rd 2024
SZSE:301525 2024年8月23日的收益和營業收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Shanghai Ruking Technologies. The company's CEO Huaigang Lei is the largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 13% and 9.2% of the stock.

我們注意到,對於上海如京科技來說,對沖基金沒有意義的投資。該公司的首席執行官雷懷剛是最大的股東,持有17%的股份。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東持有約13%和9.2%的股票。

We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前6大股東持有超過一半的股份登記簿,有一些較小的股東來平衡較大股東的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

雖然研究公司的機構持股可以增加研究價值,但研究分析師建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一個好習慣。該股票的一些分析人士需要更多的關注時間。

Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Ruking Technologies

上海如京科技的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Shanghai Ruking Technologies Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥2.0b stake in this CN¥4.1b business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

根據我們的信息,內部人員在上海瑞康科技有限公司持有重要股權。內部人員在這家價值4100百萬元的企業中擁有20億元的股份。這可能意味着創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 41% stake in Shanghai Ruking Technologies. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通投資者通常指個體投資者,他們在上海瑞康科技的持股比例爲41%。雖然這個群體可能不能直接決策,但它肯定對公司的運營產生了真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 4.3%, of the Shanghai Ruking Technologies stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

上海如京股份私人公司持有4.3%的股份。 私人公司可能是關聯方。 有時候內部人員會通過持有私人公司的方式對上市公司產生興趣,而不是以個人的身份。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得作爲進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Shanghai Ruking Technologies has 2 warning signs (and 1 which shouldn't be ignored) we think you should know about.

雖然考慮到擁有公司的不同團體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。以風險爲例-上海如京科技有2個警示信號(以及1個不容忽視的警示信號)我們認爲你應該知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論