MLOptic (SHSE:688502) Could Be Struggling To Allocate Capital
MLOptic (SHSE:688502) Could Be Struggling To Allocate Capital
If you're looking for a multi-bagger, there's a few things to keep an eye out for. In a perfect world, we'd like to see a company investing more capital into its business and ideally the returns earned from that capital are also increasing. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. However, after briefly looking over the numbers, we don't think MLOptic (SHSE:688502) has the makings of a multi-bagger going forward, but let's have a look at why that may be.
如果你正在尋找一款多功能裝袋機,有幾件事需要注意。在一個完美的世界中,我們希望看到一家公司向其業務投入更多資本,理想情況下,從這些資本中獲得的回報也在增加。如果你看到這一點,這通常意味着它是一家擁有良好商業模式和大量盈利再投資機會的公司。但是,在簡短地查看了這些數字之後,我們認爲MLOptic(SHSE: 688502)在未來不具備多裝袋機的實力,但讓我們來看看爲什麼會這樣。
Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?
資本使用回報率(ROCE):這是什麼?
If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. The formula for this calculation on MLOptic is:
如果你以前沒有與ROCE合作過,它會衡量公司從其業務中使用的資本中產生的 「回報」(稅前利潤)。在 mLOptic 上進行此計算的公式爲:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
已動用資本回報率 = 息稅前收益 (EBIT) ¥(總資產-流動負債)
0.018 = CN¥21m ÷ (CN¥1.4b - CN¥168m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2024).
0.018 = 2100萬元人民幣 ÷(14元人民幣至1.68億元人民幣)(基於截至2024年3月的過去十二個月)。
Thus, MLOptic has an ROCE of 1.8%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Electronic industry average of 5.2%.
因此,MLOptic的投資回報率爲1.8%。歸根結底,這是一個低迴報,其表現低於電子行業5.2%的平均水平。
Above you can see how the current ROCE for MLOptic compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering MLOptic for free.
在上面你可以看到MLOptic當前的投資回報率與其先前的資本回報率相比如何,但從過去可以看出來的只有那麼多。如果你願意,你可以免費查看報道MLOptic的分析師的預測。
So How Is MLOptic's ROCE Trending?
那麼 MLOptic 的 ROCE 趨勢如何呢?
On the surface, the trend of ROCE at MLOptic doesn't inspire confidence. To be more specific, ROCE has fallen from 25% over the last five years. On the other hand, the company has been employing more capital without a corresponding improvement in sales in the last year, which could suggest these investments are longer term plays. It's worth keeping an eye on the company's earnings from here on to see if these investments do end up contributing to the bottom line.
從表面上看,mLOptic的投資回報率趨勢並不能激發信心。更具體地說,投資回報率已從過去五年的25%下降。另一方面,該公司在去年一直在使用更多資本,但銷售額沒有相應改善,這可能表明這些投資是長期投資。從現在起,值得關注公司的收益,看看這些投資最終是否確實爲利潤做出了貢獻。
On a side note, MLOptic has done well to pay down its current liabilities to 12% of total assets. That could partly explain why the ROCE has dropped. Effectively this means their suppliers or short-term creditors are funding less of the business, which reduces some elements of risk. Some would claim this reduces the business' efficiency at generating ROCE since it is now funding more of the operations with its own money.
順便說一句,MLOptic在將其流動負債償還至總資產的12%方面做得很好。這可以部分解釋投資回報率下降的原因。實際上,這意味着他們的供應商或短期債權人減少了對企業的融資,從而降低了某些風險因素。有人會聲稱這降低了企業產生投資回報率的效率,因爲該公司現在正在用自己的資金爲更多的業務提供資金。
The Bottom Line On MLOptic's ROCE
MLOptic 投資回報率的底線
To conclude, we've found that MLOptic is reinvesting in the business, but returns have been falling. Since the stock has declined 53% over the last year, investors may not be too optimistic on this trend improving either. Therefore based on the analysis done in this article, we don't think MLOptic has the makings of a multi-bagger.
總而言之,我們發現MLOptic正在對該業務進行再投資,但回報率一直在下降。由於該股去年下跌了53%,因此投資者對這一趨勢的改善可能也不太樂觀。因此,根據本文中的分析,我們認爲mLOptic不具備多袋機的優勢。
One final note, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with MLOptic (including 2 which make us uncomfortable) .
最後一點是,你應該了解我們在mLOptic中發現的4個警告信號(包括2個讓我們感到不舒服的信號)。
For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity.
對於那些喜歡投資穩健公司的人,可以查看這份資產負債表穩健和股本回報率高的公司的免費清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。