Private Companies Among Xiamen Xiangyu Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600057) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 3.9% Price Drop
Private Companies Among Xiamen Xiangyu Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600057) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 3.9% Price Drop
Key Insights
主要見解
- Xiamen Xiangyu's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- XMXYG Corporation owns 50% of the company
- Institutional ownership in Xiamen Xiangyu is 14%
- 廈門象嶼重要的私人公司所有權表明,關鍵決策受到來自更大公衆的股東的影響。
- XMXYG公司擁有該公司的50%。
- 廈門象嶼的機構所有權爲14%。
If you want to know who really controls Xiamen Xiangyu Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600057), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 54% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果您想知道誰真正控制着廈門象嶼股份有限公司(SHSE:600057),那麼您必須查看其股東登記冊的構成。擁有最大份額的是擁有54%所有權的私人公司集團。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最大的利益(或在經濟衰退時損失最多)。
And following last week's 3.9% decline in share price, private companies suffered the most losses.
上週股價下跌了3.9%,私人企業遭受了最大的損失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Xiamen Xiangyu.
讓我們更仔細地看一看不同類型的股東對廈門象嶼能告訴我們什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Xiamen Xiangyu?
機構所有權告訴我們有關廈門象嶼的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that Xiamen Xiangyu does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Xiamen Xiangyu's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到廈門象嶼確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司的很大一部分股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經審查了這隻股票,並且他們對它持有肯定的看法。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯了。當多家機構同時持有一隻股票時,存在他們都在進行'擠兌交易'的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能爭相快速拋售股票。在沒有歷史增長記錄的公司裏,這樣的風險會更大。您可以在下方看到廈門象嶼的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更加複雜的。
Xiamen Xiangyu is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that XMXYG Corporation is the largest shareholder with 50% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 3.9% and 2.2% of the stock.
廈門象嶼不是由對沖基金擁有的。我們的數據顯示,XMXYG公司是持有的最大股東,持有50%的股份。這意味着他們對公司的未來有着主導利益的控制。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約3.9%和2.2%的股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以了解風向正在往哪裏吹。雖然有一些分析師對該股票進行了覆蓋,但隨着時間的推移,它可能仍然會變得更加知名。
Insider Ownership Of Xiamen Xiangyu
廈門象嶼的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our information suggests that Xiamen Xiangyu Co., Ltd. insiders own under 1% of the company. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own CN¥1.2m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的信息顯示,廈門象嶼股份有限公司的內部股東擁有不到1%的股份。然而,我們注意到,內部股東可能通過私人公司或其他公司結構間接持有利益。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部股東擁有價值人民幣120萬的股份。絕對價值可能比比例份額更重要。看到至少有一些內部股權是很好的,但或許值得檢查一下這些內部股東是否一直在賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 32% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Xiamen Xiangyu. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
持有32%股權的普通公衆,主要由個體投資者組成,對廈門象嶼有一定的影響力。儘管這種股權規模相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能無法改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 54%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司54%的股份,這值得更加深入地探究。如果相關方,例如內部人士,在其中一傢俬人公司中擁有利益,那麼應該在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Xiamen Xiangyu better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs for Xiamen Xiangyu that you should be aware of before investing here.
考慮到持有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解廈門象嶼,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,在投資這裏之前,我們發現了廈門象嶼的4個警示信號,你應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。