Moog Insiders Sold US$1.9m Of Shares Suggesting Hesitancy
Moog Insiders Sold US$1.9m Of Shares Suggesting Hesitancy
In the last year, many Moog Inc. (NYSE:MOG.A) insiders sold a substantial stake in the company which may have sparked shareholders' attention. Knowing whether insiders are buying is usually more helpful when evaluating insider transactions, as insider selling can have various explanations. However, if numerous insiders are selling, shareholders should investigate more.
在過去的一年裏,許多Moog Inc. (NYSE:MOG.A)內部人士大量出售了該公司的股份,這可能引起了股東們的注意。當評估內部人士交易時,了解內部人士是否在購買通常更有幫助,因爲內部人士的賣出可以有各種解釋。然而,如果有許多內部人士在賣出,股東應該進行更多的調查。
While insider transactions are not the most important thing when it comes to long-term investing, logic dictates you should pay some attention to whether insiders are buying or selling shares.
儘管在長期投資中內部交易並不是最重要的事情,但從邏輯上講,您應該關注內部人員是否買入或出售股票。
The Last 12 Months Of Insider Transactions At Moog
在過去的十二個月裏,Moog公司的內部人士交易中最大的一筆賣出交易是由非執行主席約翰·斯坎尼爾(John Scannell)進行的,他以每股141美元的價格賣出了987,000美元的股份。所以很明顯,內部人士想要獲得一些現金,在當前的188美元的價格之下。當內部人士以低於當前價格的價格賣出時,這意味着他們認爲較低的價格是公平的。這讓我們想知道他們對(較高的)最近的估值是怎麼想的。然而,雖然內部人士的賣出有時令人泄氣,但它只是一個很弱的信號。這次單次的賣出僅佔約翰·斯坎尼爾持股的8.5%。
In the last twelve months, the biggest single sale by an insider was when the Non-Executive Chairman, John Scannell, sold US$987k worth of shares at a price of US$141 per share. So it's clear an insider wanted to take some cash off the table, even below the current price of US$188. When an insider sells below the current price, it suggests that they considered that lower price to be fair. That makes us wonder what they think of the (higher) recent valuation. However, while insider selling is sometimes discouraging, it's only a weak signal. This single sale was just 8.5% of John Scannell's stake.
在過去的一年裏,Moog的內部人士沒有買入任何公司股票。您可以在下面看到過去12個月內(由公司和個人)的內部交易的圖像表示。如果您想知道誰以什麼價格在什麼時候賣出,只需單擊下面的圖表!
In the last year Moog insiders didn't buy any company stock. You can see a visual depiction of insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last 12 months, below. If you want to know exactly who sold, for how much, and when, simply click on the graph below!
在過去的一年裏,Moog的內部人士沒有買入任何公司股票。您可以在下面看到過去12個月內(由公司和個人)的內部交易的圖像表示。如果您想知道誰以什麼價格在什麼時候賣出,只需單擊下面的圖表!
If you like to buy stocks that insiders are buying, rather than selling, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: Most of them are flying under the radar).
如果你喜歡購買內部人員正在購買而不是銷售的股票,那麼你可能會喜歡這份免費的公司列表。(提示:它們中的大部分都被忽視了。)
Does Moog Boast High Insider Ownership?
Moog是否擁有較高的內部持股?
Another way to test the alignment between the leaders of a company and other shareholders is to look at how many shares they own. Usually, the higher the insider ownership, the more likely it is that insiders will be incentivised to build the company for the long term. Moog insiders own about US$56m worth of shares. That equates to 0.9% of the company. While this is a strong but not outstanding level of insider ownership, it's enough to indicate some alignment between management and smaller shareholders.
另一種測試公司領導人和其他股東之間是否一致的方法是看他們擁有多少股份。通常,內部持股越高,內部人員越有可能受到激勵爲長期建設公司而努力。Moog內部人員擁有價值約5600萬美元的股份。這相當於公司的0.9%。儘管這是一個強有力但不是突出的內部持股水平,但足以表明管理層和較小股東之間存在一定的一致性。
So What Do The Moog Insider Transactions Indicate?
那麼,Moog內部交易意味着什麼?
The fact that there have been no Moog insider transactions recently certainly doesn't bother us. We don't take much encouragement from the transactions by Moog insiders. But it's good to see that insiders own shares in the company. So while it's helpful to know what insiders are doing in terms of buying or selling, it's also helpful to know the risks that a particular company is facing. For example - Moog has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
最近沒有Moog內部交易的事實確實不讓我們擔憂。我們並不太受Moog內部人員交易的鼓舞。但看到內部人員持有公司股份還是令人欣慰的。因此,了解內部人員在購買或賣出方面的活動是有幫助的,同時了解一家特定公司面臨的風險也是有幫助的。例如 - Moog有一個警示標誌,我們認爲您應該注意。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
當然,您可能會在其他地方找到一項出色的投資。因此,請查看此免費的有趣公司列表。
For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests.
對於本文而言,內部人是指向相關監管機構報告其交易的個人。我們目前僅考慮公開市場交易和直接利益的私人處置,但不包括衍生交易或間接利益。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。