share_log

Individual Investors Who Hold 35% of Cipher Mining Inc. (NASDAQ:CIFR) Gained 4.2%, Institutions Profited as Well

Individual Investors Who Hold 35% of Cipher Mining Inc. (NASDAQ:CIFR) Gained 4.2%, Institutions Profited as Well

持有Cipher Mining Inc.(納斯達克:CIFR)35%股份的個體投資者獲得了4.2%的收益,機構也獲利了。
Simply Wall St ·  08/24 08:46

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over Cipher Mining by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 10 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 個人投資者對Cipher Mining具有重要控制權,這意味着普通大衆對管理和治理決策具有更大的影響力
  • 前10大股東持有50%的股份。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

If you want to know who really controls Cipher Mining Inc. (NASDAQ:CIFR), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 35% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想知道誰真正控制着Cipher Mining Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:CIFR),那麼您必須看其股東註冊情況。而持有最大股份的是個人投資者,佔35%的所有權。也就是說,如果股價上漲(或者出現下跌)的話,這一群體將獲得最大的利益(或是承擔最大的損失)。

While individual investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 4.2% price gain, institutions also received a 29% cut.

上週股價上漲4.2%,最受益的是個體投資者,機構也獲得了29%的收益。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Cipher Mining.

讓我們仔細看一看不同類型的股東對Cipher Mining有什麼信息。

1724496463270
NasdaqGS:CIFR Ownership Breakdown August 24th 2024
納斯達克GS:CIFR在2024年8月24日的所有權分佈情況

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cipher Mining?

機構持股情況對Cipher Mining的意義?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Cipher Mining already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Cipher Mining's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Cipher Mining的股東名冊中已經有機構。實際上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也有可能錯。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,總會存在「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多個方都可能競相快速出售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Cipher Mining的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事始終更復雜。

1724503564216
NasdaqGS:CIFR Earnings and Revenue Growth August 24th 2024
2024年8月24日,納斯達克GS:CIFR收益和營收增長。

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Cipher Mining. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Bitfury Holding B.V. with 18% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 15% and 4.0% of the stock. In addition, we found that Rodney Page, the CEO has 1.3% of the shares allocated to their name.

我們注意到對Cipher Mining的投資並不是機構的重要投資。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是Bitfury Holding b.V.,持有18%的流通股份。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東持有約15%和4.0%的股票。此外,我們發現首席執行官Rodney Page擁有1.3%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了更深入的挖掘,並發現前10大股東約佔註冊表的50%,這意味着除了大股東以外,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of Cipher Mining

Cipher Mining的內部持股權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Cipher Mining Inc.. Insiders own US$218m worth of shares in the US$1.2b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息顯示,內部人士持有Cipher Mining Inc.的大量股份。內部人士在這家市值120億美元的公司中擁有價值2.18億美元的股份。這是相當有意義的。大多數人會說,這表明在這樣規模的公司中,與股東保持了良好的一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是在買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 35% stake in Cipher Mining. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通民衆,通常是個人投資者,在Cipher Mining中持有35%的股份。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以影響政策決定偏向他們,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 18%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有該公司18%的股份。這可能值得進一步研究。如果相關方,如內部人,對其中一個私人公司有興趣,這應該在年報中披露。私人公司也可能對該公司有戰略興趣。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Cipher Mining (at least 1 which is a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常值得,但還有其他更重要的因素。 例如,要考慮投資風險這個一直存在的威脅。我們已經發現了Cipher Mining的4個警示信號(至少有1個有點不愉快),理解它們應該成爲你的投資過程的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論