share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ:HOOD) With 65% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ:HOOD) With 65% Ownership

機構投資者對納斯達克(NASDAQ)上的羅賓漢市場有着很大的利益,擁有65%的所有權。
Simply Wall St ·  08/24 09:45

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Robinhood Markets' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 13 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • 15% of Robinhood Markets is held by insiders
  • 考慮到機構在股票中所佔的大部分股權,羅賓漢市場的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
  • 前13名股東佔該公司50%的股份。
  • 羅賓漢市場15%的股份由內部持有。

A look at the shareholders of Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ:HOOD) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 65% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看一下羅賓漢市場股份的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最具影響力。(納斯達克:HOOD). 機構擁有65%的股份,在公司中佔據最大股權。換句話說,該群體從對公司的投資中最有可能獲得最多(或者失去最多)

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$1.0b in market cap last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 100% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

上週該公司市值增加了10億美元,機構投資者的情況正在好轉。目前的投資回報率爲100%,上週的增長無疑是受歡迎的。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Robinhood Markets.

讓我們更仔細地看看股東的不同類型能告訴我們關於羅賓漢市場的什麼。

1724507103186
NasdaqGS:HOOD Ownership Breakdown August 24th 2024
NasdaqGS:HOOD所有權拆分於2024年8月24日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Robinhood Markets?

機構投資者的持股情況對我們關於羅賓漢市場有何啓示?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Robinhood Markets does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Robinhood Markets' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到羅賓漢市場確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總會存在它們的交易被'擁擠'的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多個方面可能會競相快速賣出股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面查看羅賓漢市場的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住故事總會更加複雜。

1724497065927
NasdaqGS:HOOD Earnings and Revenue Growth August 24th 2024
2024年8月24日NasdaqGS: HOOD盈利和營業收入增長

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Robinhood Markets. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Robinhood Markets' case, its Top Key Executive, Baiju Bhatt, is the largest shareholder, holding 7.4% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.8% and 6.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Vladimir Tenev is also a Chairman of the Board, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,所以他們可以對董事會決策產生很大影響。我們注意到對沖基金對Robinhood Markets沒有重大投資。行動勝過言辭,當內部人持有公司的大量股份時,我們認爲這是個好跡象。在Robinhood Markets的案例中,其最高主管Baiju Bhatt是最大的股東,持有7.4%的流通股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股份的6.8%和6.4%。有趣的是,第三大股東Vladimir Tenev也是董事會主席,再次表明公司的頂級股東之間存在強大的內部持股權。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

在我們的所有權數字中仔細看看,前13名股東擁有的股權合計爲50%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Robinhood Markets

Robinhood Markets的內部持股權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Robinhood Markets, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$18b, and insiders have US$2.6b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

Robinhood Markets, Inc.似乎很多股份由內部持有。它的市值僅爲180億美元,內部持有26億美元的股份。這相當可觀。大多數人都會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望查看最近內部交易的免費圖表。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Robinhood Markets. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

通常公衆持有20%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對Robinhood Markets有一定的影響力。雖然這種所有權可能還不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論