With 89% Institutional Ownership, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (NYSE:CHD) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
With 89% Institutional Ownership, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (NYSE:CHD) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Church & Dwight's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 15 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Insiders have sold recently
- 鑑於機構在股票中擁有的大部分股份,道富銀行的股價可能會受到他們的交易決策的影響。
- 共有15名投資者擁有該公司的多數股份,擁有50%的所有權。
- 近期內有內部人士出售股票
Every investor in Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (NYSE:CHD) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 89% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
每位道富銀行公司(紐交所:CHD)的投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。機構持有該公司89%的股份。換句話說,該群體在他們對該公司的投資中可能會獲得最多的利益(或者承擔最大的風險)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於他們擁有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構所有權往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者來說。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於公司往往被認爲是一種令人嚮往的品質。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Church & Dwight, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究雀巢和德威斯的每一種所有者類型,首先看下面的圖表。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Church & Dwight?
機構持有權告訴我們有關雀巢和德威斯的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Church & Dwight already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Church & Dwight's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
雀巢和德威斯已經有機構持有股份登記。事實上,他們在公司擁有一個可觀的股份。 這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這支股票,他們喜歡它。 但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯了。 當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總會有它們進行'擁擠交易'的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多個方可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。 您可以在下面看到雀巢和德威斯的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更多。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Church & Dwight. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 12% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.6% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 5.0% of the company stock.
投資者應該注意,其實機構擁有公司超過一半的股份,所以他們可以共同行使重大的影響力。我們注意到對於Church & Dwight,對沖基金並沒有意義的投資。根據我們的數據顯示,最大的股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,擁有12%的流通股份。BlackRock, Inc.是第二大股東,持有8.6%的普通股,而State Street Global Advisors, Inc.持有公司約5.0%的股票。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
仔細觀察我們的股權拆分數據表明,前15大股東持有的股權總和爲50%,這意味着沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Church & Dwight
Church & Dwight的內部股權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that Church & Dwight Co., Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$45m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們的信息顯示,Church & Dwight Co., Inc.的內部人士僅持有該公司不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,所以內部人士擁有大量的公司股份是令人驚訝的。儘管他們的持股比例不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共同持有價值45百萬元的股份(按照當前股價計算)。看到董事會成員持有股份是好事,但可以值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在買入股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
廣大公衆——包括零售投資者——在公司中擁有11%的持股,因此不能被輕視。雖然這個群體不能決定掌控權,但它確實可以對公司的運營產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Church & Dwight .
我發現查看公司的股東是非常有趣的。但是要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該注意到我們在Church & Dwight中發現的1個警告信號。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。