With 68% Ownership, Central New Energy Holding Group Limited (HKG:1735) Insiders Have a Lot Riding on the Company's Future
With 68% Ownership, Central New Energy Holding Group Limited (HKG:1735) Insiders Have a Lot Riding on the Company's Future
Key Insights
主要見解
- Central New Energy Holding Group's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- 68% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Zhuyun Yu)
- Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 中新能源控股集團重要的內部持有量表明瞭其對公司擴張的固有利益。
- 該公司的68%股份由單一股東(俞竹雲)持有。
- 通過公司過去的業績數據和股權研究,人們可以更好地評估一家公司的未來表現。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Central New Energy Holding Group Limited (HKG:1735), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 68% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要理解誰實際控制着中能新能源控股集團有限公司(HKG:1735),了解該公司的所有權結構非常重要。 擁有68%股份的個人內部人士在公司中擁有最多的股份。 也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團最有可能獲得最大的利益(或者如果市場出現下滑,該集團最可能承受最大的損失)。
So it follows, every decision made by insiders of Central New Energy Holding Group regarding the company's future would be crucial to them.
因此,中新能母基內部人士對公司未來做出的每個決定對他們來說都至關重要。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Central New Energy Holding Group, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解中新能源控股集團的每種所有者類型,從下圖開始。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Central New Energy Holding Group?
機構缺乏持股對於中新能源控股集團意味着什麼?
Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.
通常,不活躍的小公司缺少機構投資者,但大公司缺少機構投資者則不太常見。
There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Central New Energy Holding Group's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.
機構不持有某股票有多種解釋。最常見的情況是公司相對於管理資金而言太小,因此機構不會費心仔細研究該公司。另一種可能是有關公司使機構投資者望而卻步。中新能母基的盈利和營業收入歷史數據(下文)可能不太吸引機構投資者,或者他們根本沒有仔細了解過該業務。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Central New Energy Holding Group. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Zhuyun Yu with 68% of shares outstanding. This implies that they possess majority interests and have significant control over the company. Investors usually consider it a good sign when the company leadership has such a significant stake, as this is widely perceived to increase the chance that the management will act in the best interests of the company. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 0.02% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 0.01% by the third-largest shareholder. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Yujuan Zhu is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
我們注意到對Central New Energy Holding Group,對沖基金沒有有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是首席執行官於竹雲,持有68%的股份。這意味着他們擁有多數投票權並對公司有重大控制權。當公司的領導層擁有這麼大的股權時,投資者通常認爲這是一個好的跡象,因爲這被普遍認爲會增加管理層以最佳利益行事的機會。作爲背景,第二大股東持有約0.02%的流通股份,第三大股東持有0.01%的股權。有趣的是,第三大股東朱玉娟也是董事會成員,再次表明公司的頂級股東中有強大的內部持股。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但考慮到分析師的看法,了解風向也是有意義的。我們的信息表明,該股票沒有任何分析師的覆蓋,因此它可能鮮爲人知。
Insider Ownership Of Central New Energy Holding Group
中新能源控股集團的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Central New Energy Holding Group Limited. This gives them effective control of the company. Insiders own HK$26b worth of shares in the HK$38b company. That's extraordinary! Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to discover if they have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,內部持有新能股份控股集團有限公司超過一半的股份。這使他們有效地控制了公司。內部持有價值260億港元的股份,這家價值380億港元的公司。這是非同尋常的!大多數人會高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望了解他們是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 32% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Central New Energy Holding Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
擁有32%的股權,普通大衆主要由個人投資者組成,在新能股份控股集團有一定程度的影響力。雖然這種所有權規模可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Central New Energy Holding Group (including 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) .
我發現深入了解公司的實際所有者是非常有趣的。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們也需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該了解我們發現的新能股份控股集團存在的2個警告信號(其中1個讓我們有點不舒服)。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
當然,您可能會在其他地方找到一項出色的投資。因此,請查看此免費的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。