While Private Companies Own 31% of OFILM Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002456), Retail Investors Are Its Largest Shareholders With 58% Ownership
While Private Companies Own 31% of OFILM Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002456), Retail Investors Are Its Largest Shareholders With 58% Ownership
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over OFILM Group by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 41% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- 10% of OFILM Group is held by Institutions
- OFILm Group Co., Ltd(SZSE:002456)由個體投資者對其進行重要控制,這意味着普通公衆有更多權力來影響管理和治理相關決策。
- 前25名股東持有41%的業務。
- OFILm Group Co., Ltd(SZSE:002456)的10%持有者爲機構。
Every investor in OFILM Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002456) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 58% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
每個OFILm Group Co., Ltd.(SZSE:002456)的投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,個體投資者擁有該公司58%的所有權。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Meanwhile, private companies make up 31% of the company's shareholders.
同時,私人公司佔該公司股東的31%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of OFILM Group, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究歐菲光每種所有者類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。
![1724655456133](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240826/42855653-0-049f4acfea407620a32f797f374b8f4c.webp/bigjpg)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About OFILM Group?
機構所有權告訴我們關於歐菲光的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
OFILM Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of OFILM Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
歐菲光已經吸引了機構進入股東名冊。事實上,他們在公司擁有相當大的股份。 這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。 但是,最好還是謹慎依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們也有時會犯錯。 如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,這很常見會導致股價大幅下跌。 因此,值得檢查一下歐菲光過去的盈利軌跡,(如下)。 當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
![1724655457524](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240826/42855653-1-46cdcce4bb76ae046f667204680642f4.webp/bigjpg)
OFILM Group is not owned by hedge funds. Shenzhen Oufei Investment Holding Co., Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 8.9% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.2% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.9% by the third-largest shareholder.
歐菲光不是由對沖基金持有。目前深圳歐菲投資控股有限公司是最大的股東,持有8.9%的股份。爲了提供背景,第二大股東持有約6.2%的股份,第三大股東持有4.9%的股份。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of OFILM Group
歐菲光公司的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in OFILM Group Co., Ltd.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around CN¥324m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
股東可能會感興趣知道,OFILm集團股份有限公司的內部人士擁有股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能具有實質意義的一致性是一個積極的信號。在這種情況下,他們持有約3.24億人民幣的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到內部人士有這種投資水平是件好事。您可以在這裏檢查,看看這些內部人員最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 58% of OFILM Group. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.
一般公衆(包括零售投資者)擁有OFILm集團58%的股份。有了這麼多持股,零售投資者可以共同在影響股東回報的決策中發揮作用,例如股利政策和董事的任命。他們還可以行使投票權,投票決定關於併購會導致盈利能力下降的問題。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 31%, of the OFILM Group stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
OFILm Group股票由私人公司持有31%。私人公司可能是有關聯關係的方。股票內部人士有時會通過持有私人公司的方式間接持有上市公司的利益,而非以個人名義。雖然很難得出任何普遍結論,但這值得作爲進一步研究的領域予以關注。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with OFILM Group (including 1 which is a bit unpleasant) .
我很有興趣了解到底誰擁有一家公司。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。 爲此,您應該了解一下我們發現的歐菲光存在的兩個警示信號(其中一個有點不愉快)。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。