share_log

Is ResMed (NYSE:RMD) A Risky Investment?

Is ResMed (NYSE:RMD) A Risky Investment?

瑞思邁(紐交所:RMD)是一個高風險的投資嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  08/26 08:27

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that ResMed Inc. (NYSE:RMD) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:「波動性與風險遠非相同。」 當我們評估一家公司的風險性時,關注其資產負債表是很自然的,因爲債務往往在企業倒閉時扮演了重要角色。我們可以看到瑞思邁股份有限公司(紐交所:RMD)在業務中使用了債務。但真正的問題是這些債務是否給公司增加風險。

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

一般來說,當公司無法通過籌集資本或使用自身現金流輕鬆償還債務時,債務才真正成爲一個問題。最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法律義務,股東可能一無所獲。雖然這種情況並不常見,但我們經常看到舉債公司因放貸人迫使其以低於市場價的價格籌集資本而永久稀釋股東。當然,債務對於企業來說也可以是一種重要的工具,尤其是對於資本密集型企業而言。當我們考慮公司使用債務時,我們首先將現金和債務放在一起看。

What Is ResMed's Net Debt?

瑞思邁的淨債務是多少?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that ResMed had debt of US$707.2m at the end of June 2024, a reduction from US$1.44b over a year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$238.4m, its net debt is less, at about US$468.9m.

下面的圖片,點擊可以查看更多細節,顯示瑞思邁於2024年6月底的債務爲7,072百萬美元,較一年前的14.4億美元有所減少。然而,由於其有2,384百萬美元的現金儲備,其淨債務少了約4,689百萬美元左右。

1724675259452
NYSE:RMD Debt to Equity History August 26th 2024
紐交所:RMD的債務權益歷史數據,截至2024年8月26日。

How Healthy Is ResMed's Balance Sheet?

ResMed的資產負債表如何?

According to the last reported balance sheet, ResMed had liabilities of US$910.7m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$1.10b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of US$238.4m and US$837.3m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$932.7m.

根據最近公佈的資產負債表,ResMed有91070萬美元的短期負債,11億美元的長期負債。另一方面,它有23840萬美元的現金和83730萬美元的應收賬款。所以它的負債超過了現金和(短期)應收賬款的總和,金額爲93270萬美元。

Of course, ResMed has a titanic market capitalization of US$33.3b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse. Carrying virtually no net debt, ResMed has a very light debt load indeed.

當然,ResMed擁有令人驚人的333億美元的市值,所以這些負債可能是可控的。話雖如此,顯然我們應繼續監控其資產負債表,以防情況變壞。ResMed幾乎沒有淨債務,負債負擔非常輕。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。

ResMed's net debt is only 0.31 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 30.3 times the size. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. Also positive, ResMed grew its EBIT by 20% in the last year, and that should make it easier to pay down debt, going forward. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if ResMed can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

ResMed的淨債務僅爲其EBITDA的0.31倍。而且其EBIT輕鬆覆蓋了利息費用,達到了30.3倍的規模。所以我們對其非常保守地使用債務感到相當放心。此外,ResMed在過去一年中的EBIT增長了20%,這將使其更容易償還債務。當你分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要重點關注的領域。但最終,企業未來的盈利能力將決定ResMed是否能夠隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。所以,如果你關注未來,你可以查看這份免費的分析師盈利預測報告。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. During the last three years, ResMed produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 58% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

但我們的最後考慮也很重要,因爲一家公司不能用虛擬利潤償還債務;它需要冷酷無情的現金。所以我們總是檢查有多少EBIT轉化爲自由現金流。在過去的三年中,ResMed產生了穩固的自由現金流,相當於其EBIT的58%,與我們的預期相符。這筆冷酷無情的現金意味着它在需要時可以減少債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

ResMed's interest cover suggests it can handle its debt as easily as Cristiano Ronaldo could score a goal against an under 14's goalkeeper. And that's just the beginning of the good news since its net debt to EBITDA is also very heartening. We would also note that Medical Equipment industry companies like ResMed commonly do use debt without problems. Overall, we don't think ResMed is taking any bad risks, as its debt load seems modest. So we're not worried about the use of a little leverage on the balance sheet. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. We've identified 1 warning sign with ResMed , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

瑞思邁的利息支付能力表明其可以像C羅在14歲以下門將面前進球一樣輕鬆處理其債務。這只是好消息的開始,因爲其淨債務與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤比也非常令人振奮。我們還應該注意,瑞思邁這樣的醫療設備行業公司通常在使用債務時並沒有問題。總體而言,我們認爲瑞思邁沒有承擔任何不良風險,因爲其負債負擔似乎很適度。因此,我們對資產負債表上的一點槓桿使用並不擔心。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是開始的地方。然而,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表內,遠非如此。我們已經確定了與瑞思邁相關的1個警示信號,了解它們應該是你投資過程的一部分。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

說到底,有時候更容易集中精力關注根本不需要債務的公司。讀者可以免費訪問零淨債務增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論