share_log

Institutional Investors in ACM Research, Inc. (NASDAQ:ACMR) See US$106m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

Institutional Investors in ACM Research, Inc. (NASDAQ:ACMR) See US$106m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

ACm Research公司(納斯達克:ACMR)的機構投資者上週市值減少1.06億美元,儘管長期收益使他們受益。
Simply Wall St ·  08/27 06:14

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in ACM Research implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 16 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders own 12% of ACM Research
  • 機構在AcM Research中的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 共有16名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
  • 內部人士擁有AcM Research12%的股份

A look at the shareholders of ACM Research, Inc. (NASDAQ:ACMR) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 55% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看AcM Research, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:ACMR)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。機構擁有55%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$106m last week. However, the 22% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

上週該公司的市值下降了1.06億美元后,機構投資者遭受了最大的損失。但是,22%的股東一年回報率可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。但是他們可能會對未來的損失保持警惕。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of ACM Research.

在下圖中,我們放大了ACM Research的不同所有權組。

1724753687264
NasdaqGM:ACMR Ownership Breakdown August 27th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:ACMR 所有權明細 2024 年 8 月 27 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ACM Research?

關於AcM Research,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in ACM Research. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at ACM Research's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如你所見,機構投資者在AcM Research中擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看acM Research的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

1724753688922
NasdaqGM:ACMR Earnings and Revenue Growth August 27th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:ACMR 收益和收入增長 2024 年 8 月 27 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in ACM Research. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Hui Wang with 9.0% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.5% and 6.2% of the stock.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對AcM Research進行有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大股東是首席執行官王輝,其已發行股份的9.0%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約6.5%和6.2%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 16 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現排名前16位的合計持有該公司的50%所有權,這表明沒有一個單一股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of ACM Research

acM Research 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of ACM Research, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.2b, and insiders have US$151m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

看來內部人士擁有AcM Research, Inc.的很大一部分股份。它的市值僅爲12億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值1.51億美元的股票。這非常重要。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 21% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有該公司21%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決策,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 11% stake in ACM Research. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有AcM Research11%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with ACM Research (including 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) .

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,你應該了解我們在AcM Research中發現的3個警告信號(包括一個讓我們有點不舒服的信號)。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論