Is Northrop Grumman (NYSE:NOC) A Risky Investment?
Is Northrop Grumman (NYSE:NOC) A Risky Investment?
The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE:NOC) does carry debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
由伯克希爾哈撒韋的查理·芒格支持的外部基金經理李錄,毫不掩飾地表示:「最大的投資風險不是價格的波動性,而是是否會遭受到資本的永久性損失。」因此,當你考慮任何一支股票的風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。重要的是,諾斯羅普格魯曼公司(NYSE:NOC)確實有債務。但是股東們應該擔心它使用債務嗎?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來了什麼風險?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
債務可以幫助一家公司,直到公司難以償還,無論是通過新的資本還是通過自由現金流。如果情況變得非常糟糕,債權人可以接管企業。雖然這種情況並不常見,但我們經常看到負債累累的公司因債權人迫使他們以低於市值的價格籌集資本而導致股東權益被稀釋。當然,很多公司使用債務來資助增長,沒有任何負面後果。在考慮一家企業使用多少債務時,第一件事是查看它的現金和債務。
How Much Debt Does Northrop Grumman Carry?
諾斯羅普格魯曼承載了多少債務?
The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Northrop Grumman had US$16.3b in debt in June 2024; about the same as the year before. However, it does have US$3.27b in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$13.0b.
下圖顯示了諾斯羅普格魯曼在2024年6月擁有163億美元的債務,與前一年基本持平。然而,它有32.7億美元的現金用於抵消這些債務,從而得出淨債務約爲130億美元。
A Look At Northrop Grumman's Liabilities
諾斯羅普格魯曼負債情況一覽
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Northrop Grumman had liabilities of US$12.9b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$20.5b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$3.27b as well as receivables valued at US$8.71b due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$21.4b.
我們可以從最近的資產負債表看出,諾斯羅普格魯曼的短期負債爲129億美元,長期負債爲205億美元。 抵消這些債務的是,它有32.7億美元的現金和價值87.1億美元的應收賬款,其中12個月內到期。 因此,它的負債超過了現金和(短期)應收賬款的總和,超過了214億美元。
Northrop Grumman has a very large market capitalization of US$74.9b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.
諾斯羅普格魯曼的市值爲749億美元,因此很可能會籌集資金改善其資產負債表,如果有需要的話。但我們絕對要警惕跡象表明其債務帶來了過多風險。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。
Northrop Grumman's debt is 3.0 times its EBITDA, and its EBIT cover its interest expense 5.2 times over. Taken together this implies that, while we wouldn't want to see debt levels rise, we think it can handle its current leverage. Shareholders should be aware that Northrop Grumman's EBIT was down 50% last year. If that decline continues then paying off debt will be harder than selling foie gras at a vegan convention. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Northrop Grumman's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
諾斯羅普格魯曼的債務是EBITDA的3.0倍,其EBIT覆蓋了5.2倍的利息支出。 綜合考慮,這意味着,雖然我們不希望看到債務水平上升,但我們認爲它可以應對當前的槓桿。 股東們應該注意,諾斯羅普格魯曼的EBIT去年下降了50%。 如果這種下降持續下去,償還債務會比在素食者大會上賣鵝肝更困難。 資產負債表顯然是在分析債務時要關注的領域。 但更重要的是,未來的收益,而不是其他任何東西,將決定諾斯羅普格魯曼未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。 因此,如果您想了解專業人士的看法,您可能會發現,分析師盈利預測的這份免費報告非常有趣。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. In the last three years, Northrop Grumman's free cash flow amounted to 33% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.
最後,儘管稅收部門可能崇拜會計利潤,但放貸人只接受冰冷的現金。 因此,我們總是會檢查EBIT中有多少被轉化成自由現金流。 在過去三年中,諾斯羅普格魯曼的自由現金流佔其EBIT的33%,低於預期。 這種較弱的現金轉化使其更難處理負債。
Our View
我們的觀點
Mulling over Northrop Grumman's attempt at (not) growing its EBIT, we're certainly not enthusiastic. Having said that, its ability to cover its interest expense with its EBIT isn't such a worry. Looking at the balance sheet and taking into account all these factors, we do believe that debt is making Northrop Grumman stock a bit risky. Some people like that sort of risk, but we're mindful of the potential pitfalls, so we'd probably prefer it carry less debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Northrop Grumman you should know about.
考慮到諾斯羅普格魯曼試圖(不)增長其EBIt,我們並不樂觀。但是,它用EBIt覆蓋利息支出的能力並不是一個大問題。從資產負債表來看,考慮到所有這些因素,我們認爲債務使諾斯羅普格魯曼的股票有些風險。有些人喜歡這種風險,但我們對潛在的風險問題保持警惕,所以我們可能更喜歡它承擔較少的債務。資產負債表很明顯是分析債務時需要關注的領域,但歸根結底,每個公司都可能存在超出資產負債表範圍的風險。這些風險很難發現,但每個公司都有,我們已經發現了諾斯羅普格魯曼的兩個警示信號,你應該知道。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
歸根結底,專注於沒有淨債務的公司往往更好。您可以訪問我們的特別列表,其中包括所有表現出盈利增長軌跡的公司。這是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。