An Excellent Week for Metals Acquisition Limited's (NYSE:MTAL) Institutional Owners Who Own 41% as One-year Returns Inch Higher
An Excellent Week for Metals Acquisition Limited's (NYSE:MTAL) Institutional Owners Who Own 41% as One-year Returns Inch Higher
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Metals Acquisition implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 8 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Insiders have bought recently
- 機構在金屬收購中的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
- 前8名股東擁有公司51%的股份
- 內部人士最近買了
Every investor in Metals Acquisition Limited (NYSE:MTAL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 41% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
金屬收購有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:MTAL)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲41%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$914m in market cap. The one-year return on investment is currently 7.2% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上週,在該公司的市值達到9.14億美元之後,機構投資者最終受益最大。一年的投資回報率目前爲7.2%,上週的漲幅本來會非常受歡迎。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Metals Acquisition, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究每種類型的金屬收購所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Metals Acquisition?
關於金屬收購,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。
We can see that Metals Acquisition does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Metals Acquisition's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到,金屬收購公司確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到金屬收購的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多內容。
It would appear that 8.2% of Metals Acquisition shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Our data shows that Glencore plc is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. With 8.6% and 8.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Fourth Sail Capital LP are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Michael James McMullen directly holds 2.4% of the total shares outstanding.
看來8.2%的金屬收購股票由對沖基金控制。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可以非常活躍和活躍。許多人正在尋找推動股價上漲的中期催化劑。我們的數據顯示,嘉能可集團是最大股東,已發行股份的13%。貝萊德公司和Fourth Sail Capital LP分別擁有8.6%和8.2%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。此外,該公司首席執行官邁克爾·詹姆斯·麥克穆倫直接持有已發行股份總額的2.4%。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前8名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of Metals Acquisition
金屬收購的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Metals Acquisition Limited. It has a market capitalization of just US$914m, and insiders have US$32m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有金屬收購有限公司的股份。它的市值僅爲9.14億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值3200萬美元的股票。有人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但是可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司27%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
It appears to us that public companies own 19% of Metals Acquisition. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.
在我們看來,上市公司擁有19%的金屬收購股份。很難肯定地說,但這表明它們將商業利益交織在一起。這可能是一個戰略利害關係,因此值得關注這個領域的所有權變動。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Metals Acquisition you should know about.
儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,考慮風險。每家公司都有它們,我們發現了一個你應該知道的金屬收購警告信號。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。