share_log

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (NYSE:HPE) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 83%

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (NYSE:HPE) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 83%

慧與科技公司(紐交所代碼:HPE)是機構投資者中的寵兒,其擁有83%的股權。
Simply Wall St ·  08/29 09:06

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Hewlett Packard Enterprise's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 18 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 考慮到機構在股票中擁有的大份額,惠普企業的股價可能會受到它們的交易決策的影響。
  • 前18大股東擁有該公司50%的所有權。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

A look at the shareholders of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (NYSE:HPE) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 83% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

對惠普企業股份有限公司(紐交所代碼:HPE)的股東進行審查,可以告訴我們哪個群體最具有影響力。該機構持有公司股份的最大份額約爲83%,換句話說,如果股價上漲,該群體將獲得最大好處(或者在出現下行趨勢時損失最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

考慮到機構持有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構投資者投資公司的大量資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Hewlett Packard Enterprise.

讓我們仔細觀察一下不同類型的股東對慧與科技能給我們提供什麼樣的信息。

1724936761751
NYSE:HPE Ownership Breakdown August 29th 2024
紐交所HPE股權分佈 2024年8月29日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hewlett Packard Enterprise?

機構持股能爲我們提供關於慧與科技的什麼信息?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Hewlett Packard Enterprise already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Hewlett Packard Enterprise's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

慧與科技已經有機構作爲股東。事實上,他們在公司擁有相當大的股份。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經看過這支股票,而且喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,看一下慧與科技以下的收入歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

1724936763462
NYSE:HPE Earnings and Revenue Growth August 29th 2024
2024年8月29日紐交所: 慧與科技收益和營業收入增長

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Hewlett Packard Enterprise. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 13% of shares outstanding. With 9.7% and 5.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們很可能能夠強烈影響董事會的決策。對於慧與科技來說,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大的股東,持有13%的流通股份。而BlackRock, Inc.和State Street Global Advisors, Inc.分別持有9.7%和5.3%的流通股份,是第二大和第三大股東。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 18 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的調查,我們發現前18名股東持有該公司50%的股份,這表明沒有任何單個股東控制着該公司。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Hewlett Packard Enterprise

慧與科技的內部股權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$94m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最新的數據顯示,慧與科技公司的內部持有人所持有的股份不到1%。由於公司規模如此之大,我們不會期望內部持有人擁有大量的股票。加起來,他們共擁有9400萬美元的股票。看到董事會成員持有股份是好事,但值得檢查的是這些內部持有人是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括零售投資者在內的普通大衆擁有該公司16%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這種所有權的大小可能不足以使政策決策朝他們的方向傾斜,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hewlett Packard Enterprise better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Hewlett Packard Enterprise that you should be aware of.

考慮到持有公司股份的不同群體是值得思考的。但要更好地了解慧與科技,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經發現了慧與科技的3個值得注意的警示信號,你應該知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論