share_log

Is AAR (NYSE:AIR) Using Too Much Debt?

Is AAR (NYSE:AIR) Using Too Much Debt?

AAR (紐交所:AIR)是否使用了過多的債務?
Simply Wall St ·  08/30 06:56

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that AAR Corp. (NYSE:AIR) does have debt on its balance sheet. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

大衛·伊本(David Iben)說得很好:「我們不關心波動性,我們關心的是避免永久性的資本損失。」當我們考慮一家公司的風險性時,我們總是喜歡看它的債務使用情況,因爲債務過載可能導致滅亡。我們注意到AAR Corp.(紐交所:AIR)的資產負債表上確實有債務。但這個債務是否讓股東擔憂呢?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

企業的債務和其他負債在無法輕鬆履行這些義務時會變得風險重重,無論是通過自由現金流還是以優惠的價格籌集資金。 如果情況變得非常糟糕,債權人可以接管企業。 然而,更常見的(但仍然昂貴)情況是公司必須以便宜的股票價格稀釋股東權益,從而簡單地控制債務。不過,通過取代股權稀釋,債務對於需要資本以高回報率投資增長的企業來說可能是一個極好的工具。 在考慮公司的債務水平時的第一步是將其現金和債務一起考慮。

What Is AAR's Net Debt?

AAR的淨債務是多少?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of May 2024 AAR had US$985.4m of debt, an increase on US$269.7m, over one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$85.8m, its net debt is less, at about US$899.6m.

您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數字,但它顯示截至2024年5月,AAR公司負債爲98540萬美元,較去年增加26970萬美元。然而,由於其現金儲備爲8580萬美元,其淨債務較少,約爲89960萬美元。

1725015387469
NYSE:AIR Debt to Equity History August 30th 2024
2024年8月30日紐交所(NYSE):AIR的債務股本比歷史數據。

How Healthy Is AAR's Balance Sheet?

AAR的資產負債表有多健康?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that AAR had liabilities of US$466.9m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.11b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$85.8m in cash and US$423.6m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$1.07b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

我們可以從最近的資產負債表看出,AAR到期的負債有46690萬美元,而到期日超過一年的負債有11.1億美元。相應的,它有8580萬美元現金和42360萬美元應於12個月內到期的應收賬款。所以,它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款總額多107億美元。

While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since AAR has a market capitalization of US$2.27b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

雖然這可能看起來很多,但並不算太糟,因爲AAR的市值爲22.7億美元,因此如果需要的話,它可能通過籌集資本來加強其資產負債表。但很明顯,我們絕對需要仔細調查它是否能夠管理好債務而不用發行新股。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

通過查看公司的淨債務與利息、稅、折舊、攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)之比以及它的利息費用(利息覆蓋率)可以衡量一個公司的債務負擔與收益能力。因此,我們考慮將債務與有無計算折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對比。

AAR's debt is 4.4 times its EBITDA, and its EBIT cover its interest expense 4.0 times over. This suggests that while the debt levels are significant, we'd stop short of calling them problematic. On a slightly more positive note, AAR grew its EBIT at 18% over the last year, further increasing its ability to manage debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine AAR's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

AAR的債務是其息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的4.4倍,其EBIT可以覆蓋其利息開支的4.0倍。這表明儘管其債務水平是巨大的,但我們不會認爲其成爲問題。稍微更積極的是,AAR在過去一年內的EBIT增長了18%,進一步增強了其管理債務的能力。毫無疑問,我們最多可以從資產負債表中了解債務情況。但最終決定AAR未來能否保持健康資產負債表的是未來的盈利。所以,如果您想了解專業人士的看法,您可能會對此免費的分析師利潤預測報告感興趣。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last three years, AAR reported free cash flow worth 16% of its EBIT, which is really quite low. That limp level of cash conversion undermines its ability to manage and pay down debt.

最後,雖然稅務局可能喜歡會計利潤,但放貸人只接受冷硬現金。所以我們清楚地需要看看EBIT是否會轉化爲相應的自由現金流。在過去三年中,AAR報告的自由現金流相當於其EBIT的16%,這實際上非常低。這種低水平的現金轉化削弱了其管理和償還債務的能力。

Our View

我們的觀點

Both AAR's net debt to EBITDA and its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow were discouraging. At least its EBIT growth rate gives us reason to be optimistic. When we consider all the factors discussed, it seems to us that AAR is taking some risks with its use of debt. So while that leverage does boost returns on equity, we wouldn't really want to see it increase from here. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. To that end, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with AAR (including 1 which is potentially serious) .

AAR公司的淨債務/息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤和息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤轉化爲自由現金流的表現令人泄氣。至少其息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤增長率讓我們有理由樂觀。當我們考慮所有討論的因素時,我們認爲AAR公司在債務使用方面承擔了一些風險。因此,雖然槓桿確實能提高資產回報率,但我們不希望看到它從這裏增加。毫無疑問,我們最了解債務情況的地方是資產負債表。然而,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表內,相反。爲此,您應該了解我們發現的AAR公司的4個警示信號(其中一個可能很嚴重)。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

歸根結底,專注於沒有淨債務的公司往往更好。您可以訪問我們的特別列表,其中包括所有表現出盈利增長軌跡的公司。這是免費的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論