John Bean Technologies (NYSE:JBT) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
John Bean Technologies (NYSE:JBT) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that John Bean Technologies Corporation (NYSE:JBT) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
伯克希爾哈撒韋旗下的外部基金經理、李錄(Charlie Munger)毫不隱諱地說:「最大的投資風險不是價格的波動性,而是你是否會遭受永久性的資本損失。」 當我們考慮一家公司有多大風險時,我們總是喜歡看看它的債務使用情況,因爲債務過載可能會導致毀滅。我們可以看到紐交所股票代碼爲JBT的約翰賓技術公司(JBT)確實在業務中使用了債務。 但這些債務是否讓股東擔憂呢?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來了什麼風險?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
債務在企業遇到困難無法償還時,可以幫助企業。如果情況變得非常糟糕,債權人可以控制企業。雖然這種情況並不常見,但我們經常看到負債企業因被債權人強迫以賤價籌集資本而對股東造成永久稀釋。當然,很多公司使用債務來資助增長,沒有任何負面後果。考慮公司的債務水平時,第一步是考慮其現金和債務總額。
What Is John Bean Technologies's Net Debt?
約翰賓技術的淨債務是多少?
As you can see below, John Bean Technologies had US$647.6m of debt at June 2024, down from US$950.5m a year prior. On the flip side, it has US$475.3m in cash leading to net debt of about US$172.3m.
正如您下面所看到的,約翰賓技術在2024年6月的債務爲64760萬美元,比前一年的95050萬美元減少。 相反,它有47530萬美元的現金,導致淨債務約爲17230萬美元。
A Look At John Bean Technologies' Liabilities
紐翻賓技術的負債情況
The latest balance sheet data shows that John Bean Technologies had liabilities of US$442.9m due within a year, and liabilities of US$728.4m falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$475.3m in cash and US$311.5m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$384.5m.
最新的資產負債表數據顯示,紐翻賓技術有44290萬美元的短期到期負債,以及72840萬美元隨後到期的負債。與此相抵,它有47530萬美元的現金和31150萬美元的應收款項,這些款項在12個月內到期。因此,其負債超過其現金和(短期)應收款項的總和38450萬美元。
Since publicly traded John Bean Technologies shares are worth a total of US$2.82b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.
由於公開交易的紐翻賓技術股票總值爲28.2億美元,這種水平的負債似乎不太可能構成重大威脅。但有足夠的負債,我們肯定會建議股東繼續關注資產負債表情況。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
我們使用兩個主要的比率來告訴我們相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),而第二個是其利潤前利息和稅(EBIT)覆蓋其利息費用的次數(或其利息覆蓋率,簡稱)。因此,我們考慮與折舊和攤銷費用相關的盈利以及沒有相關費用的盈利相對於債務水平。
John Bean Technologies has net debt of just 0.68 times EBITDA, suggesting it could ramp leverage without breaking a sweat. And remarkably, despite having net debt, it actually received more in interest over the last twelve months than it had to pay. So it's fair to say it can handle debt like a hotshot teppanyaki chef handles cooking. While John Bean Technologies doesn't seem to have gained much on the EBIT line, at least earnings remain stable for now. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if John Bean Technologies can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
約翰賓技術的淨債務僅爲0.68倍的EBITDA,表明它可以增加槓桿而無需付出努力。而且令人驚訝的是,儘管有淨債務,過去十二個月它實際上收到的利息超過了它需要支付的金額。因此,可以說它可以像一位出色的鐵板燒大廚一樣處理債務。雖然約翰賓技術似乎在EBIt線上沒有獲得太多收益,但至少收益目前保持穩定。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但最終,企業未來的盈利能力將決定約翰賓技術是否能隨着時間加強其資產負債表。所以,如果您想了解專業人士的看法,您可能會發現對分析師盈利預測的免費報告很有趣。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, John Bean Technologies recorded free cash flow of 22% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.
最後,雖然稅務部門可能熱愛會計利潤,但借款人只接受冰冷的現金。因此,邏輯的下一步是看一下EBIt中與實際自由現金流匹配的比例。查看最近三年,約翰賓技術的自由現金流爲其EBIt的22%,這比我們預期的要弱。這種弱勢現金轉換使得處理負債變得更加困難。
Our View
我們的觀點
On our analysis John Bean Technologies's interest cover should signal that it won't have too much trouble with its debt. However, our other observations weren't so heartening. For instance it seems like it has to struggle a bit to convert EBIT to free cash flow. Considering this range of data points, we think John Bean Technologies is in a good position to manage its debt levels. But a word of caution: we think debt levels are high enough to justify ongoing monitoring. Over time, share prices tend to follow earnings per share, so if you're interested in John Bean Technologies, you may well want to click here to check an interactive graph of its earnings per share history.
根據我們的分析,約翰賓技術的利息覆蓋率表明其在債務方面不會有太大的困擾。然而,我們的其他觀察並不那麼令人振奮。例如,它似乎需要付出一些努力將EBIt轉化爲自由現金流。考慮到這些數據點的範圍,我們認爲約翰賓技術能夠很好地管理其債務水平。但請注意:我們認爲債務水平高到足以需要持續監控。隨着時間的推移,股價往往會跟隨每股收益,因此如果您對約翰賓技術感興趣,您可能希望點擊這裏查看其每股收益歷史的交互式圖表。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
說到底,有時候更容易集中精力關注根本不需要債務的公司。讀者可以免費訪問零淨債務增長股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。