share_log

After Losing 19% in the Past Year, UiPath Inc. (NYSE:PATH) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

After Losing 19% in the Past Year, UiPath Inc. (NYSE:PATH) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

在過去的一年裏下跌19%之後,UiPath Inc. (紐交所:PATH) 的機構投資者對最近的漲幅應該鬆了一口氣。
Simply Wall St ·  08/30 10:17

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, UiPath's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
  • Insider ownership in UiPath is 20%
  • 考慮到機構在股票中所佔的大比例,UiPath的股價可能受到他們交易決定的影響
  • 前11名股東持有公司50%的股份。
  • UiPath的內部所有權爲20%

To get a sense of who is truly in control of UiPath Inc. (NYSE:PATH), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 57% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

爲了了解誰真正控制着UiPath Inc.(紐約證券交易所:PATH),重要的是要了解業務的所有權結構。持有最大股份的是擁有57%所有權的機構群體。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲益最大(或者如果出現下滑,將損失最大)。

Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 6.5% increase in the share price after a year of 19% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.

機構投資者可能會歡迎上週股價上漲6.5%,因爲經歷了19%的虧損一年,這可能意味着回報率可能開始趨高。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about UiPath.

讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們UiPath的什麼情況。

1725027434341
NYSE:PATH Ownership Breakdown August 30th 2024
紐交所:PATH 所屬權分解2024年8月30日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About UiPath?

機構所有權告訴我們關於UiPath的什麼信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that UiPath does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of UiPath, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到UiPath確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的很大一部分股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師們已經研究過這支股票並且喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者嘗試同時拋售一隻股票,很常見會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查UiPath過去的收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,還要考慮其他因素。

1725027435465
NYSE:PATH Earnings and Revenue Growth August 30th 2024
紐交所:PATH盈利和營業收入增長2024年8月30日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in UiPath. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Daniel Dines with 19% of shares outstanding. With 7.5% and 5.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and ARK Investment Management LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.

由於機構投資者擁有超過發行股票的一半,董事會很可能需要注意它們的偏好。我們注意到對UiPath並沒有明顯的對沖基金投資。根據我們的數據,最大的股東是首席執行官Daniel Dines,持有19%的股份。The Vanguard Group, Inc. 和 ARk Investment Management LLC分別持有佔總股本的7.5%和5.2%,是第二和第三大股東。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 11 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

深入研究我們的所有權數據表明,前11名股東持有的股份總計50%,意味着沒有單個股東掌握多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of UiPath

UiPath的內部人持股

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in UiPath Inc.. Insiders own US$1.4b worth of shares in the US$7.2b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

根據我們的信息顯示,公司內部人士在UiPath Inc.擁有重要的持股。內部人士在這家市值72億美元的公司中擁有14億美元的股份。這是相當有意義的。大多數人都會很高興看到董事會與他們一起進行投資。您可以訪問此免費圖表,了解最近內部人員的交易情況。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 23% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公衆(包括散戶投資者)擁有該公司的23%股權,因此他們不容易被忽視。儘管該群體不能一呼百應,但肯定會對公司的運營產生實際影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for UiPath that you should be aware of before investing here.

我發現查找公司的真正所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,在投資這裏之前,我們發現了UiPath的3個警告信號,你應該了解。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論