share_log

Judge's Early Ruling May Shape Outcome In Ozempic, Wegovy Lawsuits

Judge's Early Ruling May Shape Outcome In Ozempic, Wegovy Lawsuits

法官早期裁決可能會影響奧澤米平和維戈維訴訟的結果
Benzinga ·  08/30 13:38

U.S. District Judge Karen Marston of Philadelphia recently issued a pivotal ruling in a closely watched multidistrict litigation (MDL) involving diabetes and weight-loss drugs.

費城的美國地方法官Karen Marston最近在一起備受關注的關於糖尿病和減肥藥物的多地法院集中訴訟中作出了具有里程碑意義的裁決。

The litigation focuses on alleged side effects of medications such as Ozempic, Wegovy, and Mounjaro, developed by Novo Nordisk A/S (NYSE:NVO) and Eli Lilly And Co (NYSE:LLY).

該訴訟集中於諾和諾德斯克公司(紐交所:NVO)和禮來公司(紐交所:LLY)開發的Ozempic、Wegovy和Mounjaro等藥物的所謂副作用。

Also Read: Novo Nordisk Does Not Operate As Drug Cartel, CEO Defends US Pricing Of Ozempic Against Criticism Over High Drug Prices.

此外還有報道稱:新秋葉公司並不像一個藥物卡特爾,首席執行官爲零售高昂的奧澤匹克辯護。

The ruling centers on the defendants' request to address several key legal questions at the outset of the case, which could potentially streamline or even halt the litigation before it gains momentum.

該裁決集中於被告方在案件初期提出解決幾個關鍵法律問題的請求,這有可能在訴訟獲得動力之前壓縮或甚至停止訴訟。

Reuters highlights that the plaintiffs in the MDL allege that these medications caused gastroparesis, a condition where the stomach's ability to pass food to the small intestines slows or stops.

路透社強調,訴訟集中於原告聲稱這些藥物導致胃輕癱,這是一種胃部將食物傳送到小腸放慢或停止的情況。

Plaintiffs claim that the drug labels did not adequately warn of this risk. However, Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly contend that their labels disclose gastrointestinal side effects, including nausea and vomiting.

原告聲稱藥物標籤未充分警告這種風險。然而,諾和諾德斯克和禮來公司主張藥物標籤披露了包括噁心和嘔吐在內的胃腸道副作用。

They argue that if plaintiffs cannot definitively prove they suffer from gastroparesis rather than other gastrointestinal issues, their claims should be pre-empted by the existing warnings.

他們認爲,如果原告不能明確證明他們患有胃輕癱而不是其他胃腸道問題,他們的訴訟應受到現有警告的限制。

The judge emphasized that these legal questions could be resolved without hearing from individual plaintiffs. This ruling could significantly impact the trajectory of the case, especially if it leads to dismissing claims or narrowing the issues to be litigated.

法官強調,這些法律問題可以在不聽取個體原告陳述的情況下得到解決。這一裁決可能對案件的進展軌跡產生重大影響,尤其是如果導致撤銷或限制要訴訟的問題。

Plaintiffs' lawyers argued that it is premature to address these questions without a full factual record from bellwether trials.

原告律師們認爲,在沒有來自先例審判的完整事實記錄的情況下,討論這些問題爲時過早。

They expressed concern that Marston's early rulings might set a precedent that limits plaintiffs' ability to present individual circumstances.

他們表達了對馬斯頓早期裁決可能設立先例,限制原告陳述個體情況能力的擔憂。

An Eli Lilly spokesperson welcomed the ruling, stating that it would "accelerate resolution" of what the company views as meritless lawsuits.

禮來發言人對裁決表示歡迎,並表示這將「加速解決」公司視爲無根據的訴訟。

As the case progresses, legal experts will be closely watching to see how this unusual approach influences the outcome, potentially setting a new standard for future MDLs.

隨着案件的進展,法律專家將密切關注這種飛凡手段對結果的影響,可能爲未來MDLs設立新標準。

Disclaimer: This content was partially produced with the help of AI tools and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.

免責聲明:本內容部分使用人工智能工具生成,並經Benzinga編輯審核發佈。

  • Mpox Vaccine: Emergent BioSolutions' Smallpox Vaccine Gets FDA Nod For Expanded Use For Individuals At High Risk Of Mpox Infection.
  • Mpox生物-疫苗:Emergent BioSolutions的天花生物-疫苗獲得FDA批准,擴大了對高危Mpox感染個體的使用。

Image By Natalia Varlei On Shutterstock

圖片來自Natalia Varlei的Shutterstock

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論