With 87% Ownership, Yum! Brands, Inc. (NYSE:YUM) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
With 87% Ownership, Yum! Brands, Inc. (NYSE:YUM) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Yum! Brands implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 7 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Recent sales by insiders
- 紐交所(Yum! Brands)的機構巨大持股意味着他們對公司的股價有重要影響力。
- 前7大股東擁有公司50%的股份
- 最近由內部人士出售。
A look at the shareholders of Yum! Brands, Inc. (NYSE:YUM) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 87% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
觀察Yum! Brands, Inc. (NYSE:YUM)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最具有影響力。占主導地位的是擁有87%股份的機構。換句話說,這個集團在投資公司時最能獲得最多的利益(或損失最大的利益)
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於他們擁有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構所有權往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者來說。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於公司往往被認爲是一種令人嚮往的品質。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Yum! Brands.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了Yum! Brands的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Yum! Brands?
機構持股告訴我們關於Yum! Brands的什麼信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that Yum! Brands does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Yum! Brands, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到Yum! Brands確實擁有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的一大部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽。然而,最好不要過分依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一隻股票,很常見看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查Yum! Brands的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Yum! Brands is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Capital Research and Management Company is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 8.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有該公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重要權力。Yum!品牌不是由對沖基金持有的。我們的數據顯示,資本研究和管理公司是持有13%流通股的最大股東。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的12%和8.4%。
We also observed that the top 7 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前7名股東擁有超過一半的股份登記冊,還有一些小股東來平衡較大股東的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。
Insider Ownership Of Yum! Brands
Yum!品牌的內部股權所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that Yum! Brands, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$55m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的信息表明,百勝餐飲集團股份有限公司的內部持有不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,因此如果內部持有大比例的股份,可能會令人吃驚。儘管他們持有的股份不足1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員集體持有價值5500萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到至少有一些內部持有股份總是件好事,但值得注意的是,可能值得檢查這些內部人是否一直在賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
包括零售投資者在內的公衆持有公司的13%股權,因此不能被輕易忽略。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以在他們有利時推動政策決策,但他們仍可以共同影響公司的政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for Yum! Brands (2 are significant) that you should be aware of.
我發現查看公司的實際所有人非常有趣。但要真正獲取洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了百勝餐飲集團的4個警告信號(其中2個是重要的),您應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。