Elon Musk Cleared Of Dogecoin Market Manipulation Charges
Elon Musk Cleared Of Dogecoin Market Manipulation Charges
U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein has dismissed a lawsuit against Elon Musk and Tesla Inc., which accused them of manipulating the Dogecoin (CRYPTO: DOGE) market.
美國地方法院法官阿爾文·海勒斯坦駁回了對埃隆·馬斯克和特斯拉公司的訴訟,後者指控他們操縱狗狗幣(加密貨幣:DOGE)市場。
What Happened: A group of Dogecoin investors initiated a lawsuit against Musk and Tesla in 2022. The investors claimed that Musk had influenced the DOGE market through his public remarks.
發生了什麼:一群狗狗幣投資者於2022年對馬斯克和特斯拉提起訴訟。投資者聲稱,馬斯克通過其公開言論影響了DOGE市場。
The investors alleged that Musk was involved in a pump-and-dump scheme. However, Hellerstein ruled in favor of Musk's legal team this week, effectively ending the legal dispute.
投資者聲稱馬斯克參與了一項抽水拋售計劃。但是,海勒斯坦本週作出了有利於馬斯克法律團隊的裁決,實際上結束了法律糾紛。
Hellerstein examined the specific quotes from Musk that were highlighted in the complaint. He expressed that he "failed to see" how Musk's comments could be interpreted as market manipulation or a pump-and-dump scheme.
海勒斯坦研究了投訴中強調的馬斯克的具體名言。他表示,他 「看不出」 馬斯克的言論如何被解釋爲市場操縱或拋售計劃。
In a statement, Hellerstein said, "These paragraphs allege statements by Musk on 'Twitter' to the effect that Dogecoin might be his favorite currency and that he had purchased some for his son, that Dogecoin is the people's crypto and the future currency of Earth, that Dogecoin might become the standard for the global financial system and the currency of the internet, that Musk agreed to become Dogecoin's CEO, and that Musk might put a 'literal' Dogecoin in SpaceX and fly it to the moon and that Dogecoin would pay for the mission, that Tesla vehicles could be bought with Dogecoin, and the like."
海勒斯坦在一份聲明中說:「這些段落指控馬斯克在'推特'上發表聲明,大意是狗狗幣可能是他最喜歡的貨幣,他已經爲兒子購買了一些貨幣,狗狗幣是人們的加密貨幣,也是地球的未來貨幣,狗狗幣可能成爲全球金融體系和互聯網貨幣的標準,馬斯克同意成爲狗狗幣的首席執行官,馬斯克可能會寫一個'字面意思 'SpaceX中的狗狗幣然後飛向月球然後狗狗幣將爲任務付出代價,特斯拉的汽車可能是用狗狗幣等購買。」
Also Read: Tesla's Dogecoin Adoption Sends Crypto Market Into Frenzy, Meme Coin Surges By Over 21%
另請閱讀:特斯拉採用狗狗幣使加密市場陷入瘋狂,模因幣飆升超過21%
"These statements are aspirational and puffery, not factual and susceptible to being falsified. They cannot be the basis of 10b-5 lawsuit... and no reasonable investor could rely upon them," the statement said.
「這些陳述既雄心勃勃又誇張,不是事實,很容易被僞造。聲明說,它們不能成爲100億美元訴訟的基礎... 任何理智的投資者都不能依賴它們。」
The judge described Musk's statements as "aspirational and puffery, not factual and susceptible to being falsified." He concluded that these comments could not form the basis of a 10b-5 lawsuit and no reasonable investor could rely upon them.
法官將馬斯克的言論描述爲 「雄心勃勃和誇張,不是事實,很容易被僞造。」他得出結論,這些言論不能構成100億美元訴訟的基礎,任何理智的投資者都無法信賴這些言論。
Why It Matters: This ruling is significant as it sets a precedent for future cases involving allegations of market manipulation through public comments. It highlights the importance of discerning between factual statements and aspirational comments when investing in volatile markets like cryptocurrencies.
爲何重要:該裁決意義重大,因爲它爲未來涉及通過公衆意見操縱市場指控的案件開創了先例。它強調了在投資加密貨幣等動盪市場時區分事實陳述和理想評論的重要性。
The dismissal of this lawsuit may also alleviate some of the legal pressure on Musk and Tesla, allowing them to focus on their core business operations.
該訴訟的駁回也可能緩解馬斯克和特斯拉麪臨的一些法律壓力,使他們能夠專注於核心業務運營。
This content was partially produced with the help of Benzinga Neuro and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.
該內容部分是在Benzinga Neuro的幫助下製作的,並由Benzinga編輯審查和出版。