share_log

Is Ryder System (NYSE:R) Using Too Much Debt?

Is Ryder System (NYSE:R) Using Too Much Debt?

萊德系統(紐交所:R)是否使用了過多的債務?
Simply Wall St ·  09/02 08:22

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We note that Ryder System, Inc. (NYSE:R) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:「波動性與風險並非同義詞。」當你評估一個公司的風險時,自然會考慮到其資產負債表,因爲企業倒閉通常涉及到債務。我們注意到萊德系統(NYSE:R)的資產負債表上確實有債務。但更重要的問題是:這些債務產生了多大的風險?

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

債務帶來了什麼風險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

債務在企業遇到新資本或自由現金流付不起時提供了幫助。在最糟糕的情況下,債務無法償還可能導致公司破產,無法償還債權人。雖然這種情況並不多見,但我們經常會看到負債公司因受債權人迫使其以低價籌集資本而永久稀釋股東權益。當然,債務在企業中可以是一個重要工具,尤其是那些資本密集型的企業。在評估債務水平時,我們首先考慮現金和債務的總量。

How Much Debt Does Ryder System Carry?

萊德系統承擔了多少債務?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of June 2024 Ryder System had US$7.48b of debt, an increase on US$6.48b, over one year. However, it also had US$164.0m in cash, and so its net debt is US$7.31b.

你可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數字,它顯示截至2024年6月,萊德系統的債務爲74.8億美元,較一年前增加了6.48億美元。然而,它還有1.64億美元的現金,所以淨債務爲731億美元。

big
NYSE:R Debt to Equity History September 2nd 2024
紐交所:R 股債務與股權歷史記錄 追溯到2024年9月2日

How Strong Is Ryder System's Balance Sheet?

萊德系統的資產負債表有多強?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Ryder System had liabilities of US$3.18b due within a year, and liabilities of US$10.1b falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$164.0m as well as receivables valued at US$1.86b due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$11.3b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

最新資產負債表數據顯示,萊德系統的短期負債爲18.6億美元,到期負債爲101億美元。與此相抵,其現金爲16400萬美元,應收賬款爲18.6億美元。因此,其負債總額比現金和短期應收賬款的組合多出113億美元。

The deficiency here weighs heavily on the US$6.29b company itself, as if a child were struggling under the weight of an enormous back-pack full of books, his sports gear, and a trumpet. So we definitely think shareholders need to watch this one closely. At the end of the day, Ryder System would probably need a major re-capitalization if its creditors were to demand repayment.

這個負債對這家總額629億美元的公司來說負擔沉重,就像一個孩子揹着揹包、體育用品和一個小號在承受巨大的壓力。所以我們肯定認爲股東們需要密切關注。最終,如果債權人要求償還,萊德系統可能需要進行重大再資本化。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我們通過將公司的淨債務與其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)相除,並計算其息稅前利潤(EBIT)如何覆蓋其利息費用(利息覆蓋率)來衡量公司的債務負擔相對於其盈利能力。因此,我們同時考慮債務的絕對數量以及所支付的利率。

Ryder System's debt is 2.8 times its EBITDA, and its EBIT cover its interest expense 2.7 times over. This suggests that while the debt levels are significant, we'd stop short of calling them problematic. Fortunately, Ryder System grew its EBIT by 5.1% in the last year, slowly shrinking its debt relative to earnings. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Ryder System's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

萊德系統的債務是其EBITDA的2.8倍,EBIT可覆蓋其利息支出的2.7倍。這表明雖然債務水平仍然相當高,但我們不認爲它們是問題所在。幸運的是,萊德系統在過去一年中的EBIT增長了5.1%,相對於收入,債務在逐漸減少。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要重點關注的領域。但更重要的是,未來的收入將決定萊德系統保持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果您關注未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, Ryder System recorded free cash flow of 47% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.

最後,公司只能用現金而不是會計利潤償還債務。因此,我們需要關注EBIT是否轉化爲相應的自由現金流。在最近的三年中,萊德系統的自由現金流佔EBIT的比例爲47%,低於我們的預期。對於償還債務來說,這並不理想。

Our View

我們的觀點

Mulling over Ryder System's attempt at staying on top of its total liabilities, we're certainly not enthusiastic. But at least its EBIT growth rate is not so bad. Overall, it seems to us that Ryder System's balance sheet is really quite a risk to the business. So we're almost as wary of this stock as a hungry kitten is about falling into its owner's fish pond: once bitten, twice shy, as they say. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Ryder System (1 is a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

對於萊德系統試圖保持其總負債的努力,我們並不熱衷。但至少其息稅前利潤增長率還不錯。總的來說,對於萊德系統的資產負債表,我們認爲確實存在業務風險。所以我們對這隻股票的警惕程度幾乎和一隻飢餓的小貓對於掉進主人的魚池的懼怕程度一樣:一朝被咬,十年怕井繩,正如人們所說。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中更多了解負債情況。然而,並不是所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中 - 遠非如此。例如,我們發現了2個對於萊德系統的警示信號(其中1個有點令人擔憂!),在在投資這裏之前你應該了解到。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果在所有這些之後,您更感興趣的是具有堅實資產負債表的快速增長公司,那麼不要拖延,查看我們的淨現金增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論