share_log

Power Assets Holdings Limited's (HKG:6) Top Owners Are Individual Investors With 48% Stake, While 36% Is Held by Public Companies

Power Assets Holdings Limited's (HKG:6) Top Owners Are Individual Investors With 48% Stake, While 36% Is Held by Public Companies

電能實業控股有限公司(HKG:6)的最大股東是個人投資者,持有48%的股份,而36%的股份由上市公司持有
Simply Wall St ·  09/03 22:02

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over Power Assets Holdings by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • 16% of Power Assets Holdings is held by Institutions
  • 個人投資者對電能實業的重要控制意味着普通公衆在管理和治理相關決策中有更大的影響力。
  • 前25位股東擁有公司的50%股份。
  • 機構持有電能實業16%的股份。

Every investor in Power Assets Holdings Limited (HKG:6) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 48% to be precise, is individual investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

每個投資者在電能實業有限公司(HKG:6)都應該注意到最強大的股東群體。公司中持有最多股份的群體,準確來說約佔48%,是個人投資者。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And public companies on the other hand have a 36% ownership in the company.

另一方面,上市公司持有該公司36%的股權。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Power Assets Holdings.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了電能實業控股的不同所有權集團。

big
SEHK:6 Ownership Breakdown September 4th 2024
SEHK:6所有權分佈2024年9月4日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Power Assets Holdings?

機構持股對電能實業控股有何啓示?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Power Assets Holdings already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Power Assets Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

電能實業控股已有機構在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好還是對依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證保持警惕。他們也會出錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查一下電能實業控股的過往收入軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
SEHK:6 Earnings and Revenue Growth September 4th 2024
SEHK:6於2024年9月4日的收益和營業收入增長情況

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Power Assets Holdings. Our data shows that CK Hutchison Holdings Limited is the largest shareholder with 36% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 2.8% and 2.6% of the stock.

我們注意到,對電能實業控股沒有意義的對沖基金投資。我們的數據顯示,和記黃埔有限公司是最大的股東,持有36%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約2.8%和2.6%的股份。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Power Assets Holdings

電能實業控股的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Power Assets Holdings Limited. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own HK$12m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

根據我們最新的數據顯示,內部人員擁有的電能實業股份有限公司的股份不到1%。這是一家非常大的公司,所以如果內部人員擁有大部分公司股份的話會令人驚訝。儘管他們持有的股份不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共持有價值1200萬港元的股份(根據當前價格)。看到至少有一些內部人員持股總是讓人感到欣慰,但也值得檢查一下這些內部人員是否一直在賣出股份。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 48% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

瀋陽藍英裝備的機構投資者擁有的股份很少。這表明該公司已進入一些基金的視野,但目前職業投資者並不特別青睞它。如果業務從這裏變得更加強大,我們可能會看到更多的機構希望購買。有時,當幾家大型機構同時想要購買某隻股票時,我們會看到股價上漲。下面可以看到營收和收益的歷史,這可能有助於考慮更多的機構投資者是否會想要該股票。當然,還有其他很多因素需要考慮。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 36% of Power Assets Holdings stock. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

目前,公共公司擁有電能實業36%的股份。我們不確定,但很可能這是一個戰略性的持股。這些企業可能相似或合作。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Power Assets Holdings .

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同團體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。爲此,你應該注意到我們在電能實業發現的1個警告信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論