The Past Three Years for Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) Investors Has Not Been Profitable
The Past Three Years for Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) Investors Has Not Been Profitable
For many investors, the main point of stock picking is to generate higher returns than the overall market. But if you try your hand at stock picking, you risk returning less than the market. Unfortunately, that's been the case for longer term Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE:NOMD) shareholders, since the share price is down 29% in the last three years, falling well short of the market return of around 16%.
對於許多投資者來說,股票選擇的主要目標是實現比整個市場更高的回報。但如果你嘗試選擇股票,你可能會風險低於市場。不幸的是,這對長揸Nomad Foods股票(紐交所:NOMD)的股東來說確實是個事實,因爲在過去三年裏,股價下跌了29%,遠低於市場回報的16%左右。
It's worthwhile assessing if the company's economics have been moving in lockstep with these underwhelming shareholder returns, or if there is some disparity between the two. So let's do just that.
值得評估公司的經濟狀況是否與這些不盡如人意的股東回報同時發展並步調一致,或者兩者之間是否存在差異。因此,讓我們來看看。
In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.
禾倫·巴菲特在他的文章《格雷厄姆與多德維爾的超級投資者》中描述了股票價格並不總是合理地反映了一家企業的價值。考慮市場對一家公司的看法如何轉變的一種不完美但簡單的方法,是將每股收益(EPS)的變化與股價的動態進行比較。
During the unfortunate three years of share price decline, Nomad Foods actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 2.8% per year. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Or else the company was over-hyped in the past, and so its growth has disappointed.
在不幸的三年股價下跌期間,Nomad Foods的每股收益(EPS)實際上每年提高了2.8%。鑑於股價的反應,人們可能懷疑EPS不是一個好的指導,無法準確反映公司在此期間的業績(可能由於一次性損失或收益)。或者該公司在過去被過於炒作,因此其增長無法達到預期。
It looks to us like the market was probably too optimistic around growth three years ago. But it's possible a look at other metrics will be enlightening.
在我們看來,三年前市場可能對增長過於樂觀。但是,查看其他指標可能會很有啓發性。
We note that, in three years, revenue has actually grown at a 7.1% annual rate, so that doesn't seem to be a reason to sell shares. It's probably worth investigating Nomad Foods further; while we may be missing something on this analysis, there might also be an opportunity.
我們注意到,在過去三年中,營業收入實際上以7.1%的年增長率增長,因此這似乎不是出售股票的原因。可能值得進一步調查Nomad Foods;雖然在這項分析中我們可能遺漏了一些東西,但也可能存在機會。
You can see below how earnings and revenue have changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image).
您可以看到以下收益和營收的變化情況(通過單擊圖像了解精確值)。
You can see how its balance sheet has strengthened (or weakened) over time in this free interactive graphic.
你可以在這個免費的互動圖表中看到它的資產負債表如何隨着時間的推移而加強(或削弱)。
A Different Perspective
不同的觀點
Nomad Foods provided a TSR of 16% over the last twelve months. But that was short of the market average. On the bright side, that's still a gain, and it is certainly better than the yearly loss of about 0.9% endured over half a decade. It could well be that the business is stabilizing. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Nomad Foods better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Nomad Foods you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit unpleasant.
在過去的十二個月中,Nomad Foods提供了16%的TSR,但這低於市場平均水平。從積極的一面來看,這仍然是一個獲利,肯定比過去的半個十年的年度虧損0.9%要好。很可能這個業務正在穩定下來。長期跟蹤股價表現總是很有趣。但要更好地了解Nomad Foods,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。案例的要點:我們已經發現Nomad Foods有2個警告信號,你應該注意,並且其中一個有點令人不快。
If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: many of them are unnoticed AND have attractive valuation).
如果您喜歡與管理層一起購買股票,那麼您可能會喜歡這個公司的免費列表。 (提示:其中許多公司不爲人注意且具有吸引力的估值。)
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
請注意,本文所引述的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所上市的股票的市場加權平均回報。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。