share_log

Spotify Technology (NYSE:SPOT) Seems To Use Debt Rather Sparingly

Spotify Technology (NYSE:SPOT) Seems To Use Debt Rather Sparingly

spotify technology (紐交所:SPOT) 似乎相對節制地使用債務
Simply Wall St ·  09/04 12:27

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that Spotify Technology S.A. (NYSE:SPOT) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

傳奇基金經理李錄(得到查理·芒格支持)曾經說過,「最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是你是否會遭受到永久性的資本損失。」當你評估風險的時候,自然會考慮公司的資產負債表,因爲債務往往是企業崩潰時的一個重要因素。我們可以看到,spotify technology S.A.(紐交所:SPOT)的業務中確實使用了債務。但真正的問題是,這些債務是否使公司變得風險更高。

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

一般來說,債務只有在公司無法輕鬆償還它時才會成爲一個真正的問題,無論是通過籌集資本還是通過自由現金流。資本主義的一個重要組成部分是「創造性破壞」這一過程,即失敗的企業會被它們的銀行無情地清算。然而,更頻繁(但仍然代價高昂)的情況是,一家公司必須以低於市值的價格發行股票,從而永久性地稀釋股東,以鞏固其資產負債表。當然,債務在企業中可以是一個重要的工具,特別是在資本密集型企業中。當我們考慮一家公司對債務的利用時,首先要看現金和債務的結合。

What Is Spotify Technology's Net Debt?

Spotify Technology的淨債務是多少?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2024 Spotify Technology had debt of €1.32b, up from €1.17b in one year. But on the other hand it also has €4.95b in cash, leading to a €3.63b net cash position.

下面的圖片顯示,截至2024年6月,Spotify Technology的債務爲13.2億歐元,比去年的11.7億歐元增加。但另一方面,它也擁有49.5億歐元的現金,形成36.3億歐元的淨現金頭寸。

big
NYSE:SPOT Debt to Equity History September 4th 2024
紐交所:SPOT的債務與權益歷史 2024年9月4日

A Look At Spotify Technology's Liabilities

審視spotify technology的負債

According to the last reported balance sheet, Spotify Technology had liabilities of €4.06b due within 12 months, and liabilities of €1.83b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had €4.95b in cash and €788.0m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling €149.0m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

根據最近披露的資產負債表,spotify technology在12個月內有40.6億歐元的到期負債,超過12個月有18.3億歐元的到期負債。與此相抵,它有49.5億歐元的現金和78800萬歐元的應收款,這些款項在12個月內到期。所以它的負債總計超過現金和短期應收款的合計14900萬歐元。

Having regard to Spotify Technology's size, it seems that its liquid assets are well balanced with its total liabilities. So while it's hard to imagine that the €62.4b company is struggling for cash, we still think it's worth monitoring its balance sheet. Despite its noteworthy liabilities, Spotify Technology boasts net cash, so it's fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load!

考慮到spotify technology的規模,似乎其流動資產與總負債是良好平衡的。因此,雖然很難想象這家624億歐元的公司會因爲現金而陷入困境,我們仍認爲值得監控其資產負債表。儘管有值得注意的負債,spotify technology擁有淨現金,因此可以說它沒有沉重的債務負擔!

It was also good to see that despite losing money on the EBIT line last year, Spotify Technology turned things around in the last 12 months, delivering and EBIT of €709m. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Spotify Technology's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

去年在EBIt收支線上虧損,而在過去12個月裏,spotify technology扭虧爲盈,實現了70900萬歐元的EBIt。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要重點關注的領域。但更重要的是未來的盈利,這將決定spotify technology未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。所以,如果你專注於未來,可以查看分析師的盈利預測免費報告。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. While Spotify Technology has net cash on its balance sheet, it's still worth taking a look at its ability to convert earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) to free cash flow, to help us understand how quickly it is building (or eroding) that cash balance. Happily for any shareholders, Spotify Technology actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT over the last year. There's nothing better than incoming cash when it comes to staying in your lenders' good graces.

但我們最終的考慮也很重要,因爲一家公司不能用紙面利潤支付債務;它需要現金。雖然spotify technology在資產負債表上有淨現金,但仍值得一看其將EBIT轉化爲自由現金流的能力,以幫助我們了解它是如何快速地積累(或侵蝕)現金的。值得股東高興的是,spotify technology在過去一年實際上產生的自由現金流比EBIt多。在與貸款人保持良好關係方面,沒有比現金流入更好的事情了。

Summing Up

總之

While it is always sensible to look at a company's total liabilities, it is very reassuring that Spotify Technology has €3.63b in net cash. And it impressed us with free cash flow of €1.3b, being 184% of its EBIT. So is Spotify Technology's debt a risk? It doesn't seem so to us. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Spotify Technology .

儘管查看公司的總負債是明智的,但Spotify Technology有€36.3億的淨現金,這是非常令人放心的。它還以€13億的自由現金流給我們留下了深刻的印象,這相當於其稅息折舊攤銷前利潤(EBIt)的184%。因此,Spotify Technology的債務是否構成風險?在我們看來似乎並非如此。當您分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要關注的領域。但最終,每家公司都可能存在資產負債表之外的風險。爲此,您應該注意我們發現的Spotify Technology的2個警示信號。

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

當然,如果您是那種喜歡購買沒有債務負擔的股票的投資者,那麼不要猶豫,立即發現我們獨家的淨現金增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論