Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Standard BioTools Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LAB) Latest 9.2% Drop Adds to a Year Losses
Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Standard BioTools Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LAB) Latest 9.2% Drop Adds to a Year Losses
Key Insights
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Standard BioTools' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
A look at the shareholders of Standard BioTools Inc. (NASDAQ:LAB) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 48% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 9.2% last week. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 34% for shareholders. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. Hence, if weakness in Standard BioTools' share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Standard BioTools, beginning with the chart below.
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240905/0-1b5f3c4aa748b85c21b6b3faa09ab8cb-0-c3139086713fed9af07432e8b542333b.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Standard BioTools?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
We can see that Standard BioTools does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Standard BioTools' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240905/0-1b5f3c4aa748b85c21b6b3faa09ab8cb-1-9e3cd8036a038c6a71f1c6ac9df5a6b9.png/big)
It looks like hedge funds own 16% of Standard BioTools shares. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Casdin Capital, LLC with 19% of shares outstanding. Viking Global Investors LP is the second largest shareholder owning 16% of common stock, and Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited holds about 11% of the company stock.
Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 51% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
Insider Ownership Of Standard BioTools
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Standard BioTools Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$12m worth of the US$791m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
General Public Ownership
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
Private Equity Ownership
Private equity firms hold a 19% stake in Standard BioTools. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
Next Steps:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Standard BioTools better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Standard BioTools (2 are a bit concerning) that you should be aware of.
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.