Institutional Investors in American Superconductor Corporation (NASDAQ:AMSC) See US$66m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.
Institutional Investors in American Superconductor Corporation (NASDAQ:AMSC) See US$66m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, American Superconductor's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 18 shareholders
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 考慮到機構對該股的大舉持股,美國超導(NASDAQ:AMSC)的股價可能受到機構交易決策的影響。
- 前18位股東持有51%的股份。
- 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。
If you want to know who really controls American Superconductor Corporation (NASDAQ:AMSC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 68% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道誰真正控制着美國超導公司(NASDAQ:AMSC),那麼你必須研究其股權登記表的構成。機構持有68%的股份,是公司中最大的股東。換句話說,這個集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲取最多(或者失去最多)的利益。
Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$66m last week. However, the 116% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
上週該公司市值下降了6600萬美元,機構投資者承受了最大的損失。然而,股東們獲得了116%的一年回報,可能有所緩解。我們假設他們將會密切關注未來的弱勢。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about American Superconductor.
讓我們仔細觀察一下不同類型的股東對美國超導能提供的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About American Superconductor?
機構持股給我們關於美國超導的什麼樣的信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
American Superconductor already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of American Superconductor, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
美國超導已經有機構投資者持有股份。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當大的股份。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經對該股票進行了研究,並且他們對其持有樂觀態度。但是,他們和其他人一樣,也可能犯錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者試圖同時出售股票,股價大幅下跌是很常見的現象。因此,值得檢查美國超導的過去盈利軌跡(如下所示)。當然,還需要考慮其他因素。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in American Superconductor. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 6.4% of shares outstanding. Baillie Gifford & Co. is the second largest shareholder owning 5.6% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 5.3% of the company stock. In addition, we found that Daniel McGahn, the CEO has 2.6% of the shares allocated to their name.
由於機構投資者持有超過半數的已發行股份,董事會很可能會注意他們的偏好。對於美國超導而言,對沖基金並沒有持有很多股份。目前,BlackRock, Inc.是該公司最大的股東,持有6.4%的優先股。Baillie Gifford & Co.是第二大股東,擁有5.6%的普通股,The Vanguard Group, Inc.持有公司股份的5.3%。此外,我們發現首席執行官丹尼爾·麥克甘擁有分配給他的股份中的2.6%。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 18 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更詳細地觀察我們的所有權數據表明,前18位股東擁有51%的聯合所有權,意味着沒有單一的股東擁有大多數股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of American Superconductor
美國超導的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in American Superconductor Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$801m, and insiders have US$31m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的最新數據顯示,股票內部人士在美國超導公司擁有一些股份。它的市值只有8010萬美元,並且內部人士名下擁有價值3100萬美元的股票。這至少顯示出一定的一致性。你可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 28% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over American Superconductor. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
擁有28%的股權,廣大投資者(主要是個人投資者)對美國超導公司有一定的影響力。儘管這種所有權可能不足以對政策決策產生影響,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand American Superconductor better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - American Superconductor has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
想要了解一家公司,總是值得考慮不同的股東群體。但要更好地了解美國超導,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如承擔風險 - 我們認爲美國超導有2個警示信號你應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。