share_log

The Strong Earnings Posted By PEC (SGX:IX2) Are A Good Indication Of The Strength Of The Business

The Strong Earnings Posted By PEC (SGX:IX2) Are A Good Indication Of The Strength Of The Business

pec集團(新加坡交易所:IX2)發佈的強大盈利表明業務的實力很強。
Simply Wall St ·  09/04 18:15

When companies post strong earnings, the stock generally performs well, just like PEC Ltd.'s (SGX:IX2) stock has recently. Our analysis found some more factors that we think are good for shareholders.

當公司發佈強勁的收益報告時,股票通常表現良好,就像PEC集團(新加坡交易所:IX2)的股票最近一樣。我們的分析發現了一些我們認爲對股東有利的因素。

big
SGX:IX2 Earnings and Revenue History September 4th 2024
新加坡交易所:IX2的收益和營業收入歷史記錄2024年9月4日

A Closer Look At PEC's Earnings

對PEC的收益進行更詳細的分析

In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). In plain english, this ratio subtracts FCF from net profit, and divides that number by the company's average operating assets over that period. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF.

在高端金融中,用於衡量公司如何將報告的利潤轉化爲自由現金流(FCF)的關鍵比率是應計比率(從現金流量表中)。簡單地說,該比率將FCF減去淨利潤,然後將該數字除以該期間公司的平均運營資產。該比率向我們展示了公司利潤超過FCF的程度。

Therefore, it's actually considered a good thing when a company has a negative accrual ratio, but a bad thing if its accrual ratio is positive. While having an accrual ratio above zero is of little concern, we do think it's worth noting when a company has a relatively high accrual ratio. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".

因此,當公司的應計比率爲負時,實際上是一件好事,但如果其應計比率爲正,則是一件壞事。雖然應計比率爲零以上的事情無關緊要,但我們認爲當公司的應計比率相對較高時,值得注意。引用Lewellen和Resutek在2014年發表的一篇論文:「應計越高的公司未來利潤率越低」。

Over the twelve months to June 2024, PEC recorded an accrual ratio of -0.14. That implies it has good cash conversion, and implies that its free cash flow solidly exceeded its profit last year. To wit, it produced free cash flow of S$32m during the period, dwarfing its reported profit of S$16.0m. Notably, PEC had negative free cash flow last year, so the S$32m it produced this year was a welcome improvement.

在2023年6月的十二個月內,PEC的應計比率爲-0.14。這意味着其現金轉換良好,並且意味着其自由現金流量在去年大幅超過了利潤。在此期間,它產生了3200萬新加坡元的自由現金流量,遠遠超過了其報告的利潤1600萬新加坡元。值得注意的是,PEC去年的自由現金流量爲負值,因此今年產生的3200萬新加坡元是一個令人欣慰的改善。

Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of PEC.

注意:我們始終建議投資者檢查資產負債表的強度。單擊此處,查看我們對PEC資產負債表的分析。

Our Take On PEC's Profit Performance

關於PEC的盈利表現

PEC's accrual ratio is solid, and indicates strong free cash flow, as we discussed, above. Based on this observation, we consider it likely that PEC's statutory profit actually understates its earnings potential! Furthermore, it has done a great job growing EPS over the last year. Of course, we've only just scratched the surface when it comes to analysing its earnings; one could also consider margins, forecast growth, and return on investment, among other factors. If you'd like to know more about PEC as a business, it's important to be aware of any risks it's facing. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for PEC you should be aware of.

PEC的應計比率很穩健,表明自由現金流強勁,正如我們之前討論的那樣。根據這一觀察,我們認爲PEC的法定利潤實際上低估了其盈利潛力!此外,過去一年內增長EPS方面做得非常好。當然,在分析其收入時,我們只是觸及了皮毛;人們還可以考慮利潤率、預測增長和投資回報率等其他因素。如果您想了解PEC的業務情況,了解它所面臨的任何風險是很重要的。舉個例子:我們發現PEC存在1個警示信號,您應該注意。

Today we've zoomed in on a single data point to better understand the nature of PEC's profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful.

今天我們主要關注單一數據點,以更好地了解PEC的利潤性質。然而,還有許多其他方法可以了解一家公司。例如,許多人認爲高股東權益回報率是有利的商業經濟指標,而其他人則喜歡『跟蹤資金』,尋找內部人員正在購買的股票。儘管這可能需要一些研究,但您可能會發現這個免費的高股東權益回報率公司收藏,或者這個內部持股比重顯著的股票清單對您有所幫助。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論