share_log

Is Nanjing Iron & Steel (SHSE:600282) A Risky Investment?

Is Nanjing Iron & Steel (SHSE:600282) A Risky Investment?

南京鋼鐵(SHSE:600282)是一個高風險的投資嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  09/04 19:14

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. Importantly, Nanjing Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600282) does carry debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

有人認爲波動性而不是債務是投資者考慮風險的最佳方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過'波動性遠非風險的代名詞'。當你評估一個公司的風險時,自然會考慮其資產負債表,因爲商業崩潰時常常涉及債務。重要的是,南京鋼鐵股份有限公司(SHSE:600282)確實有債務。但股東們應該擔心它的債務使用嗎?

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

債務帶來了什麼風險?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

債務是幫助企業成長的工具,但如果企業無力償還債權人,那麼就處於債權人的掌控之下。如果情況變得非常糟糕,債權人可以接管企業。然而,更常見的情況(儘管仍然很昂貴)是企業必須以廉價股價稀釋股東的股份,才能控制債務。當然,債務可以成爲企業的重要工具,尤其是資本密集型企業。當我們考慮一家公司使用債務的情況時,我們首先看現金和債務的總體情況。

What Is Nanjing Iron & Steel's Net Debt?

南京鋼鐵的淨債務是多少?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Nanjing Iron & Steel had debt of CN¥22.3b at the end of June 2024, a reduction from CN¥25.0b over a year. However, because it has a cash reserve of CN¥6.33b, its net debt is less, at about CN¥16.0b.

下面的圖片可以點擊查看更多細節,顯示南京鋼鐵在2024年6月底的債務爲223億人民幣,較去年減少了25億人民幣。然而,由於其有633億人民幣的現金儲備,其淨債務較少,約爲160億人民幣。

big
SHSE:600282 Debt to Equity History September 4th 2024
SHSE:600282債務與股權歷史記錄2024年9月4日

How Strong Is Nanjing Iron & Steel's Balance Sheet?

南京鋼鐵的資產負債表如何?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Nanjing Iron & Steel had liabilities of CN¥32.2b due within 12 months, and liabilities of CN¥9.84b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of CN¥6.33b and CN¥10.7b worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling CN¥25.0b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

根據最新公佈的資產負債表,南京鋼鐵當前有322億人民幣的短期負債,而超過12個月到期的負債有98.4億人民幣。然而,它目前擁有63.3億人民幣的現金和107億人民幣的短期應收賬款。因此,其負債總額較現金和近期應收賬款的總和多出了250億人民幣。

This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of CN¥26.3b. Should its lenders demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution.

相對於其263億人民幣的市值,這是一座非常龐大的槓桿。如果其債權人要求其加強資產負債表,股東可能會面臨嚴重的稀釋。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

爲了衡量公司相對於其收益的債務情況,我們計算其淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)和其利息支出除以利息前收益(EBIT)的比例(其利息覆蓋率)。這種方法的優點是,我們既考慮了債務的絕對量(淨負債與 EBITDA),又考慮到了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(其利息覆蓋率)。

With net debt to EBITDA of 2.8 Nanjing Iron & Steel has a fairly noticeable amount of debt. But the high interest coverage of 8.0 suggests it can easily service that debt. Importantly, Nanjing Iron & Steel grew its EBIT by 35% over the last twelve months, and that growth will make it easier to handle its debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Nanjing Iron & Steel's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

南京鋼鐵的淨債務與EBITDA比率爲2.8,表明其負債相對較高。但高達8.0的利息覆蓋率表明它可以輕鬆償還債務。重要的是,在過去的十二個月中,南京鋼鐵的EBIT增長了35%,這種增長將使其更容易處理債務。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要關注的領域。但與任何東西相比,未來的盈利將決定南京鋼鐵能否保持健康的資產負債表。因此,如果您關注未來,您可以查看此份顯示分析師盈利預測的免費報告。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, Nanjing Iron & Steel burned a lot of cash. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.

但我們最後考慮的也很重要,因爲一家公司不能用紙上的利潤來償還債務,它需要現金。所以我們顯然需要看看EBIT是否導致相應的自由現金流。在過去的三年中,南京鋼鐵燒掉了大量現金。雖然這可能是用於增長支出的結果,但這使得債務更加風險。

Our View

我們的觀點

Nanjing Iron & Steel's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow and level of total liabilities definitely weigh on it, in our esteem. But its EBIT growth rate tells a very different story, and suggests some resilience. When we consider all the factors discussed, it seems to us that Nanjing Iron & Steel is taking some risks with its use of debt. While that debt can boost returns, we think the company has enough leverage now. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Nanjing Iron & Steel you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit unpleasant.

南京鋼鐵的EBIt轉化爲自由現金流和總負債的水平無疑給它帶來了壓力,在我們看來。但其EBIt增長率講述了一個完全不同的故事,並表明一些韌性。當我們考慮到所有討論過的因素時,我們認爲南京鋼鐵在債務使用上存在一些風險。雖然債務可以提高回報率,但我們認爲公司現在有足夠的槓桿。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中獲得關於債務的大部分信息。 但歸根結底,每個公司都可能存在於資產負債表之外的風險。A:我們發現了南京鋼鐵的2個警告信號,你應該注意其中1個有點不太好。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

說到底,有時候更容易集中精力關注根本不需要債務的公司。讀者可以免費訪問零淨債務增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論