share_log

Patrick Industries (NASDAQ:PATK) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt

Patrick Industries (NASDAQ:PATK) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt

patrick industries (納斯達克:PATK) 在使用債務方面存在一些風險
Simply Wall St ·  09/05 07:15

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ:PATK) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

禾倫·巴菲特曾說:「波動性與風險遠非同義詞。」因此,當您考慮股票風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。我們可以看到Patrick Industries, Inc.(納斯達克代碼:PATK)在業務中確實使用了債務。但更重要的問題是:這些債務帶來了多少風險?

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

債務帶來了什麼風險?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

一般來說,只有當一家公司無法輕鬆償還債務時,債務才會成爲真正的問題,要麼通過籌集資本,要麼通過自己的現金流。在最壞的情況下,如果公司無法償還債權人,它可能會破產。然而,更爲頻繁(但仍然代價高昂)的情況是,一家公司必須以低於市場的價格發行股票,永久性地稀釋股東,以支撐其資產負債表。當然,很多公司使用債務來資助增長,沒有任何負面後果。考慮一家公司的債務水平時,第一步是將其現金和債務合併考慮。

What Is Patrick Industries's Net Debt?

Patrick Industries的淨債務是多少?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of June 2024 Patrick Industries had US$1.32b of debt, an increase on US$1.22b, over one year. However, it also had US$44.0m in cash, and so its net debt is US$1.27b.

您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,但它顯示:截至2024年6月,Patrick Industries的債務爲1.32億美元,較去年增加了1.22億美元。然而,該公司也持有4400萬美元的現金,因此其淨債務爲1.27億美元。

big
NasdaqGS:PATK Debt to Equity History September 5th 2024
NasdaqGS:PATk資產負債比歷史數據(截至2024年9月5日)

How Strong Is Patrick Industries' Balance Sheet?

Patrick Industries的資產負債表有多強大?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Patrick Industries had liabilities of US$373.7m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$1.53b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$44.0m as well as receivables valued at US$252.1m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$1.61b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

根據最近公佈的資產負債表,Patrick Industries在12個月內有3.737億元的負債,超過12個月有15.3億美元的負債。抵消這些義務,它有4.4億元的現金和在12個月內到期的2521億元應收賬款。因此,它的負債總額超過現金和短期應收賬款的總和超過1.61億美元。

While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since Patrick Industries has a market capitalization of US$2.83b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.

雖然這看起來很多,但這並不糟糕,因爲Patrick Industries的市值爲2.83億美元,如果需要的話,它可能通過增加資本來加強資產負債表。但我們肯定要密切關注其債務是否帶來過多風險。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

我們通過查看淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比以及計算其利息支出由收益前利息和稅(EBIT)覆蓋的程度來度量一家公司的債務負載相對於其收益能力的程度。此方法的優點在於我們同時考慮了債務的絕對量(以淨債務爲EBITDA)以及與該債務相關的實際利息支出(以其利息覆蓋倍數計算)。

Patrick Industries has a debt to EBITDA ratio of 3.0 and its EBIT covered its interest expense 3.8 times. Taken together this implies that, while we wouldn't want to see debt levels rise, we think it can handle its current leverage. More concerning, Patrick Industries saw its EBIT drop by 7.5% in the last twelve months. If it keeps going like that paying off its debt will be like running on a treadmill -- a lot of effort for not much advancement. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Patrick Industries can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Patrick Industries的債務與EBITDA比率爲3.0,其EBIT覆蓋其利息費用的3.8倍。綜合考慮,這表明雖然我們不願意看到債務水平上升,但我們認爲它能夠處理當前的槓桿。更令人擔憂的是,Patrick Industries在過去12個月中的EBIT下降了7.5%。如果它繼續這樣下去,償還債務就像在跑步機上跑步一樣,付出了很多努力卻沒有多少進展。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表上最多了解債務。但最終,業務的未來盈利能力將決定Patrick Industries是否能夠隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您關注未來,您可以查看這份免費報告,顯示分析師對利潤的預測。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Over the last three years, Patrick Industries recorded free cash flow worth a fulsome 88% of its EBIT, which is stronger than we'd usually expect. That puts it in a very strong position to pay down debt.

最後,一家公司只能用冷硬現金而不是會計利潤來償還債務。所以,值得檢查一下其EBIT有多少是由自由現金流支持的。在過去三年中,Patrick Industries的自由現金流價值達到了其EBIT的豐厚88%,這比我們通常預期的要強。這使得該公司在償還債務方面處於非常強大的位置。

Our View

我們的觀點

Neither Patrick Industries's ability to grow its EBIT nor its interest cover gave us confidence in its ability to take on more debt. But the good news is it seems to be able to convert EBIT to free cash flow with ease. We think that Patrick Industries's debt does make it a bit risky, after considering the aforementioned data points together. That's not necessarily a bad thing, since leverage can boost returns on equity, but it is something to be aware of. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that Patrick Industries is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

既不是Patrick Industries增長EBIT的能力,也不是其利息覆蓋率,使我們對其增加債務的能力持有信心。但好消息是它似乎能夠輕鬆地將EBIT轉化爲自由現金流。綜合考慮上述數據點後,我們認爲Patrick Industries的債務確實使其有些風險。這並不一定是不好的,因爲槓桿可以提高權益回報率,但這也是需注意的。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯然的起始點。但最終,每家公司都可能存在超出資產負債表之外的風險。請注意,Patrick Industries在我們的投資分析中顯示出了3個警示信號,你應該注意到...

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論