share_log

Independent Bank Corp.'s (NASDAQ:INDB) Institutional Investors Lost 3.7% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Independent Bank Corp.'s (NASDAQ:INDB) Institutional Investors Lost 3.7% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Independent Bank Corp.的納斯達克:INDB的機構投資者上週損失了3.7%,但受益於長期收益。
Simply Wall St ·  09/06 06:00

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Independent Bank's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 高機構所有權意味着獨立銀行的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 共有10名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
  • 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票的機會

If you want to know who really controls Independent Bank Corp. (NASDAQ:INDB), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着獨立銀行公司(納斯達克股票代碼:INDB),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。機構擁有83%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$2.6b last week. However, the 17% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

上週該公司的市值跌至26億美元后,機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。但是,17%的股東一年回報率可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。但是,他們應該注意未來的進一步損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Independent Bank.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於獨立銀行的什麼。

big
NasdaqGS:INDB Ownership Breakdown September 6th 2024
NASDAQGS:INDB 所有權明細 2024 年 9 月 6 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Independent Bank?

關於獨立銀行,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Independent Bank. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Independent Bank, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所見,機構投資者在獨立銀行擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下獨立銀行過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGS:INDB Earnings and Revenue Growth September 6th 2024
NASDAQGS:INDB 收益和收入增長 2024 年 9 月 6 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Independent Bank. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 14% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 5.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對獨立銀行進行有意義的投資。貝萊德公司目前是最大股東,已發行股份的14%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的12%和5.6%。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們做了進一步的挖掘,發現10位大股東約佔登記冊的50%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Independent Bank

獨立銀行的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Independent Bank Corp.. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$24m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有的獨立銀行不到1%的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此董事會成員有可能在不擁有大量比例權益的情況下擁有該公司的有意義的權益。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約2400萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣值得考慮。你可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司16%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Independent Bank better, we need to consider many other factors.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解獨立銀行,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以在這張詳細圖表中找到歷史收入和收入。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論