share_log

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BHF) Recent US$94m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BHF) Recent US$94m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

機構投資者可能會考慮採取激烈措施,因爲Brighthouse Financial, Inc.(納斯達克:BHF)最近的9400萬美元下跌加劇了長期的損失
Simply Wall St ·  09/06 06:53

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Brighthouse Financial's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 高機構所有權意味着Brighthouse Financial的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 52% 的業務由前 9 名股東持有
  • 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票的機會

Every investor in Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ:BHF) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 83% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Brighthouse Financial, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:BHF)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲83%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$2.8b last week after a 3.4% drop in the share price. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 11% for shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Brighthouse Financial, which might have negative implications on individual investors.

因此,上週該公司的市值在股價下跌3.4%後跌至28億美元,因此機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。這組投資者可能特別擔心當前的虧損,這使股東一年的虧損增加了11%。機構通常被稱爲 「市場推動者」,在影響任何股票的價格動態方面擁有強大的力量。因此,如果下跌趨勢持續下去,機構可能會面臨出售Brighthouse Financial的壓力,這可能會對個人投資者產生負面影響。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Brighthouse Financial.

在下圖中,我們放大了Brighthouse Financial的不同所有權群體。

big
NasdaqGS:BHF Ownership Breakdown September 6th 2024
NASDAQGS: BHF 所有權明細 2024 年 9 月 6 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Brighthouse Financial?

關於Brighthouse Financial,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

Brighthouse Financial already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Brighthouse Financial's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Brighthouse Financial已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Brightouse Financial的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

big
NasdaqGS:BHF Earnings and Revenue Growth September 6th 2024
NASDAQGS: BHF 收益和收入增長 2024 年 9 月 6 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Brighthouse Financial. Our data shows that Dodge & Cox is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. With 10% and 9.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. In addition, we found that Eric Steigerwalt, the CEO has 0.5% of the shares allocated to their name.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。對沖基金在Brighthouse Financial的股票不多。我們的數據顯示,道奇和考克斯是最大股東,已發行股份的11%。Vanguard Group, Inc.和貝萊德公司分別擁有10%和9.8%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。此外,我們發現首席執行官埃裏克·斯泰格瓦爾特以其名義分配了0.5%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們做了更多挖掘,發現9位最大股東約佔登記冊的52%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Brighthouse Financial

Brighthouse Financial

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Brighthouse Financial, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$30m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有Brighthouse Financial, Inc.的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意義的調整通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約3000萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內幕調整問題,可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司16%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他更爲重要的因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我一直喜歡查看收入增長的歷史。您也可以,通過訪問此詳細圖表中的這張免費的歷史收入和收益圖表。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論