share_log

Lazard, Inc.'s (NYSE:LAZ) Institutional Investors Lost 3.6% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Lazard, Inc.'s (NYSE:LAZ) Institutional Investors Lost 3.6% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Lazard, Inc.(紐交所: LAZ)的機構投資者上週虧損了3.6%,但從長期收益中受益。
Simply Wall St ·  09/06 07:53

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Lazard implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 9 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構在Lazard的大量持股意味着他們對公司的股票價格有重要的影響。
  • 前9大股東持有該公司50%的股份。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Lazard, Inc. (NYSE:LAZ), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 86% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

爲了了解誰真正控制着Lazard公司(NYSE:LAZ),重要的是了解該公司的所有制結構。擁有86%股權的機構持有着公司的最大股份。換句話說,該機構面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$162m last week. However, the 54% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

上週該公司市值下跌了16200萬美元,使得機構投資者遭受了最大損失。然而,54%的年度回報可能有助於減輕他們的總體損失。但他們可能會對未來的損失保持警惕。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Lazard.

在下面的圖表中,我們聚焦於Lazard的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:LAZ Ownership Breakdown September 6th 2024
紐交所(NYSE):套現分析師所有權下降2024年9月6日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lazard?

機構所有權能告訴我們有關Lazard的什麼?Lazard已經有機構投資者在股東名冊上。他們確實擁有公司中相當大的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但是,我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會像所有人一樣做出糟糕的投資。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,通常會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查Lazard的過去收益軌跡(如下)。當然,還需要考慮其他因素。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

Lazard already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Lazard's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

Lazard已經有機構投資者在股權登記冊上。實際上,他們在該公司擁有可觀的股權。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得關注的是Lazard的盈利歷史,當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:LAZ Earnings and Revenue Growth September 6th 2024
紐交所:LAZ的收入和營業收入增長情況 2024年9月6日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Lazard is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.7% by the third-largest shareholder.

機構投資者擁有超過50%的股份,所以他們可能能夠強烈影響董事會的決策。Lazard不是由對沖基金所擁有的。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大的股東,持有12%的流通股份。作爲背景,第二大股東持有約11%的流通股份,第三大股東持有8.7%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了更多挖掘,發現前九大股東佔註冊資本的大約50%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有少數小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Lazard

Lazard的內部股東權益。股東可能會對於Lazard的內部股權有興趣。這是一個大公司,因此看到這種程度的協調是很好的。內部人員擁有價值1.37億美元的股份(按照當前價格)。如果您想了解內部人員的協調水平,可以點擊此處查看他們是否一直在買入或賣出。

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Lazard, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$127m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股東可能會對知道內部人士在Lazard, Inc.持有股份感興趣。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在的有意義的一致性通常是一個積極的跡象。在這種情況下,他們大約擁有價值約12700萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。 大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間有利益一致性。不過,值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

廣大公衆——包括零售投資者——在公司中擁有11%的持股,因此不能被輕視。雖然這個群體不能決定掌控權,但它確實可以對公司的運營產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Lazard better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 4 warning signs we've spotted with Lazard .

始終值得思考的是擁有一家公司股份的不同群體。但是爲了更好地了解Lazard,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您需要了解我們在Lazard中發現的4個警示信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論