We Think Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt
We Think Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt
Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. Importantly, Columbus McKinnon Corporation (NASDAQ:CMCO) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?
正如Howard Marks所說,與其擔心股價波動性,"可能的永久性虧損是我擔心的風險...我認識的每一位實際投資者也都很擔心。"因此,明智的投資者知道,債務(通常涉及破產)是評估一家公司風險程度時非常重要的因素。重要的是,Columbus McKinnon Corporation(納斯達克:CMCO)確實承擔了債務。但更重要的問題是:這種債務造成了多大的風險?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
債務何時有危險?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
債務可以幫助業務發展,直到業務遇到瓶頸,無法通過新資本或自由現金流來償還債務。最壞的情況是,公司無法償還債務,隨後破產。然而,更常見的(但仍然痛苦)情況是以低價發行新股權資本,從而永久稀釋股東的權益。當然,債務的好處是通常代表了廉價資本,特別是當它在一家公司中代替了股權稀釋,有能力以高回報率進行再投資。當我們考慮債務水平時,首先考慮現金和債務水平,二者結合在一起。
How Much Debt Does Columbus McKinnon Carry?
哥倫布-麥金農承擔了多少債務?
As you can see below, Columbus McKinnon had US$499.5m of debt at June 2024, down from US$570.8m a year prior. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$74.2m, its net debt is less, at about US$425.3m.
正如下面所示,截至2024年6月,Columbus McKinnon的債務爲499.5百萬美元,低於一年前的570.8百萬美元。然而,由於其現金儲備爲74.2百萬美元,其淨債務較低,約爲425.3百萬美元。
How Strong Is Columbus McKinnon's Balance Sheet?
哥倫布-麥金農的資產負債表有多強?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Columbus McKinnon had liabilities of US$231.5m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$664.3m due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$74.2m in cash and US$171.2m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$650.5m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
從最新的資產負債表可以看出,哥倫布-麥金農的短期負債爲2.315億美元,長期負債爲6.643億美元。此外,它有7.42億美元的現金和1.712億美元的應收賬款,這些賬款在12個月內到期。因此,它的負債總額比現金和近期應收賬款多6.505億美元。
This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of US$928.4m. Should its lenders demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution.
相對於其市值爲9.284億美元,這是一個巨大的槓桿。如果債權人要求它加強資產負債表,股東可能面臨嚴重稀釋。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
我們使用兩個主要的比率來告訴我們相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),而第二個是其利潤前利息和稅(EBIT)覆蓋其利息費用的次數(或其利息覆蓋率,簡稱)。因此,我們考慮與折舊和攤銷費用相關的盈利以及沒有相關費用的盈利相對於債務水平。
Columbus McKinnon's debt is 2.8 times its EBITDA, and its EBIT cover its interest expense 3.0 times over. This suggests that while the debt levels are significant, we'd stop short of calling them problematic. Fortunately, Columbus McKinnon grew its EBIT by 8.3% in the last year, slowly shrinking its debt relative to earnings. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Columbus McKinnon's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
哥倫布-麥金農的債務是其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的2.8倍,利息費用的覆蓋倍數爲3.0倍。這表明雖然債務水平相當可觀,但我們不會稱其爲問題。幸運的是,哥倫布-麥金農去年將其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤增長了8.3%,相對於收益而言,其債務在緩慢減少。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中獲得了關於債務的大部分信息。但與任何事物相比,未來的收益將決定哥倫布-麥金農能否保持健康的資產負債表。因此,如果你關注未來,你可以查看這份顯示分析師盈利預測的免費報告。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. In the last three years, Columbus McKinnon's free cash flow amounted to 49% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.
最後,雖然稅務部門可能喜歡會計利潤,但債權人只接受切實的現金。因此,我們總是檢查該息稅折舊攤銷前利潤被轉換爲自由現金流的金額。在過去三年中,哥倫布-麥金農的自由現金流佔其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的49%,低於我們的預期。這種較弱的現金轉換使處理債務更加困難。
Our View
我們的觀點
While Columbus McKinnon's level of total liabilities makes us cautious about it, its track record of covering its interest expense with its EBIT is no better. But its not so bad at growing its EBIT. When we consider all the factors discussed, it seems to us that Columbus McKinnon is taking some risks with its use of debt. While that debt can boost returns, we think the company has enough leverage now. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Be aware that Columbus McKinnon is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
儘管哥倫布-麥金農的總負債水平令我們謹慎,但其用基本利潤(EBIt)支付利息的記錄並不好。但是,它在增長EBIt方面並不那麼糟糕。當我們考慮到所有這些討論的因素時,我們認爲哥倫布-麥金農在債務使用方面存在一些風險。雖然債務可以增加回報,但我們認爲公司現在已經有足夠的槓桿。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。然而,並非所有的投資風險都在資產負債表中 - 遠非如此。請注意,哥倫布-麥金農在我們的投資分析中顯示出1個警示信號,您應該了解...
If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.
如果在所有這些之後,您更感興趣的是具有堅實資產負債表的快速增長公司,那麼不要拖延,查看我們的淨現金增長股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。