Skyverse Technology (SHSE:688361) Posted Weak Earnings But There Is More To Worry About
Skyverse Technology (SHSE:688361) Posted Weak Earnings But There Is More To Worry About
Shareholders didn't appear too concerned by Skyverse Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688361) weak earnings. Our analysis suggests that they may be missing some concerning details underlying the profit numbers.
股東似乎並不太關心Skyverse Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688361)的疲軟盈利。我們的分析表明,他們可能忽略了盈利數字背後一些令人擔憂的細節。
Examining Cashflow Against Skyverse Technology's Earnings
對Skyverse Technology的現金流進行檢查與盈利對比
As finance nerds would already know, the accrual ratio from cashflow is a key measure for assessing how well a company's free cash flow (FCF) matches its profit. The accrual ratio subtracts the FCF from the profit for a given period, and divides the result by the average operating assets of the company over that time. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF.
正如金融迷們已經知道的那樣,從現金流量計算的應計比率是評估公司自由現金流(FCF)與其利潤相匹配程度的重要指標。應計比率將給定期間的FCF從利潤中減去,並將結果除以公司在該期間的平均經營資產。該比率顯示公司利潤超過其FCF的程度。
Therefore, it's actually considered a good thing when a company has a negative accrual ratio, but a bad thing if its accrual ratio is positive. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.
因此,一家公司有負應計比率實際上是一件好事,但是如果它的應計比率爲正,那是一件壞事。這並不意味着我們應該擔心應計比率爲正,但值得注意的是,如果應計比率相當高,有一些學術證據表明,這是一個不利於近期利潤的壞跡象。
Skyverse Technology has an accrual ratio of 0.37 for the year to June 2024. Statistically speaking, that's a real negative for future earnings. And indeed, during the period the company didn't produce any free cash flow whatsoever. In the last twelve months it actually had negative free cash flow, with an outflow of CN¥349m despite its profit of CN¥26.4m, mentioned above. Coming off the back of negative free cash flow last year, we imagine some shareholders might wonder if its cash burn of CN¥349m, this year, indicates high risk. However, that's not all there is to consider. We can see that unusual items have impacted its statutory profit, and therefore the accrual ratio.
截至2024年6月,Skyverse Technology的應計比率爲0.37。從統計學的角度來看,這對未來盈利來說是真正的負面影響。事實上,在這一期間,該公司實際上並未產生任何自由現金流。在過去的十二個月中,儘管盈利爲人民幣2640萬,但實際上出現了負面自由現金流,流出了人民幣34900萬元。考慮到去年出現負面自由現金流,我們可以想象一些股東可能會懷疑今年的人民幣34900萬元現金流燃燒是否表明高風險。然而,並不是所有事情都要考慮。我們可以看到,一些異常項目影響了其法定盈利,因此也影響了應計比率。
That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.
這可能會讓您想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看基於其估計的未來盈利能力的互動圖表。
The Impact Of Unusual Items On Profit
除了稀釋之外,還應該注意的是,萬集科技在過去12個月中因不尋常項目獲得了價值人民幣3.5萬元的利潤。雖然我們希望看到利潤增加,但當這些不尋常項目對利潤做出重大貢獻時,我們會更加謹慎。我們對全球大部分上市公司的數據進行了分析,發現不尋常項目往往是一次性的。這正如我們所期望的那樣,因爲這些提升被描述爲"不尋常"。相對於其利潤而言,萬集科技在2021年12月前的不尋常項目貢獻大。因此,我們可以推斷出,這些不尋常項目正在使其財務利潤顯著增強。
Given the accrual ratio, it's not overly surprising that Skyverse Technology's profit was boosted by unusual items worth CN¥85m in the last twelve months. While we like to see profit increases, we tend to be a little more cautious when unusual items have made a big contribution. We ran the numbers on most publicly listed companies worldwide, and it's very common for unusual items to be once-off in nature. Which is hardly surprising, given the name. Skyverse Technology had a rather significant contribution from unusual items relative to its profit to June 2024. All else being equal, this would likely have the effect of making the statutory profit a poor guide to underlying earnings power.
考慮到計提比例,Skyverse Technology在過去十二個月中由價值8500萬人民幣的飛凡項目提振了利潤。雖然我們喜歡看到利潤增長,但當飛凡項目做出重大貢獻時,我們往往會更加謹慎。我們對全球大多數上市公司進行了數據分析,發現飛凡項目一次性貢獻的情況非常普遍。這並不奇怪,考慮到其名稱。相對於到2024年6月的利潤,Skyverse Technology從飛凡項目獲得了相當顯著的貢獻。其他條件不變的情況下,這可能會使法定利潤成爲核心盈利能力的不良指標。
Our Take On Skyverse Technology's Profit Performance
我們對Skyverse Technology的利潤表現的看法
Skyverse Technology had a weak accrual ratio, but its profit did receive a boost from unusual items. For the reasons mentioned above, we think that a perfunctory glance at Skyverse Technology's statutory profits might make it look better than it really is on an underlying level. Keep in mind, when it comes to analysing a stock it's worth noting the risks involved. Every company has risks, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Skyverse Technology (of which 1 makes us a bit uncomfortable!) you should know about.
Skyverse Technology的準確率較低,但其盈利受益於飛凡項目的增加。出於上述原因,我們認爲僅僅粗略地看一眼Skyverse Technology的法定利潤可能會使其在基本層面上看起來比實際情況要好。請記住,在分析股票時,值得注意其中涉及的風險。每家公司都存在風險,我們發現了Skyverse Technology的3個警示信號(其中有1個讓我們感到有些不舒服!),您應該知道。
Our examination of Skyverse Technology has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. And, on that basis, we are somewhat skeptical. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful.
我們對Skyverse Technology的審查主要關注了可以使其利潤看起來比實際情況更好的某些因素。基於這一點,我們持懷疑態度。但有很多其他方式可以幫助您了解一家公司。例如,許多人認爲高股本回報率是良好業務經濟狀況的指標,而其他人則喜歡「跟風走」並尋找內部人員正在購買的股票。雖然這可能需要你進行一些研究,但你可能會發現這個免費的高股本回報率公司收藏夾,或者這個持有重要內部人員持股的股票名單是有用的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。