share_log

GoodWe Technologies' (SHSE:688390) Problems Go Beyond Poor Profit

GoodWe Technologies' (SHSE:688390) Problems Go Beyond Poor Profit

GoodWe Technologies(SHSE:688390)的問題不僅僅是利潤不佳
Simply Wall St ·  09/06 18:31

The recent earnings release from GoodWe Technologies Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688390 ) was disappointing to investors. We think that they may have more to worry about than just soft profit numbers.

固德威科技有限公司(上海證券交易所股票代碼:688390)最近發佈的業績令投資者失望。我們認爲,他們可能需要擔心的不僅僅是疲軟的利潤數字。

big
SHSE:688390 Earnings and Revenue History September 6th 2024
SHSE: 688390 收益和收入歷史記錄 2024 年 9 月 6 日

Zooming In On GoodWe Technologies' Earnings

放大GoodWe Technologies的收益

One key financial ratio used to measure how well a company converts its profit to free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.

用於衡量公司將其利潤轉換爲自由現金流(FCF)的情況的一個關鍵財務比率是應計比率。爲了獲得應計比率,我們首先從一段時期的利潤中減去FCF,然後將該數字除以該期間的平均運營資產。這個比率告訴我們,一家公司的利潤中有多少沒有自由現金流的支持。

Therefore, it's actually considered a good thing when a company has a negative accrual ratio, but a bad thing if its accrual ratio is positive. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.

因此,當公司的應計比率爲負時,這實際上被認爲是一件好事,但如果其應計比率爲正,則是一件壞事。雖然正應計比率表明非現金利潤達到一定水平不是問題,但高應計比率可以說是一件壞事,因爲它表明紙面利潤與現金流不匹配。值得注意的是,有一些學術證據表明,總的來說,高應計率對短期利潤來說是個壞兆頭。

GoodWe Technologies has an accrual ratio of 0.64 for the year to June 2024. As a general rule, that bodes poorly for future profitability. And indeed, during the period the company didn't produce any free cash flow whatsoever. Even though it reported a profit of CN¥87.5m, a look at free cash flow indicates it actually burnt through CN¥1.2b in the last year. It's worth noting that GoodWe Technologies generated positive FCF of CN¥1.1b a year ago, so at least they've done it in the past. However, that's not all there is to consider. We can see that unusual items have impacted its statutory profit, and therefore the accrual ratio.

截至2024年6月的一年中,GoodWe Technologies的應計比率爲0.64。通常,這對未來的盈利能力來說是個壞兆頭。事實上,在此期間,該公司沒有產生任何自由現金流。儘管該公司報告的利潤爲8750萬元人民幣,但看一下自由現金流就會發現,去年它實際上消耗了12元人民幣。值得注意的是,GoodWe Technologies在一年前創造了11元人民幣的正FCF,因此至少他們過去曾這樣做過。但是,這還不是要考慮的全部。我們可以看到,不尋常的項目影響了其法定利潤,從而影響了應計比率。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

這可能會讓你想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看根據他們的估計描繪未來盈利能力的交互式圖表。

The Impact Of Unusual Items On Profit

不尋常物品對利潤的影響

Given the accrual ratio, it's not overly surprising that GoodWe Technologies' profit was boosted by unusual items worth CN¥97m in the last twelve months. We can't deny that higher profits generally leave us optimistic, but we'd prefer it if the profit were to be sustainable. We ran the numbers on most publicly listed companies worldwide, and it's very common for unusual items to be once-off in nature. And that's as you'd expect, given these boosts are described as 'unusual'. We can see that GoodWe Technologies' positive unusual items were quite significant relative to its profit in the year to June 2024. As a result, we can surmise that the unusual items are making its statutory profit significantly stronger than it would otherwise be.

考慮到應計比率,在過去十二個月中,價值9700萬元人民幣的不尋常物品提振了GoodWe Technologies的利潤也就不足爲奇了。我們不能否認更高的利潤通常會讓我們感到樂觀,但如果利潤是可持續的,我們更願意這樣做。我們統計了全球大多數上市公司的數字,不尋常的物品在自然界中很常見。這正如你所預料的那樣,因爲這些增強被描述爲 「不尋常」。我們可以看到,截至2024年6月的一年中,GoodWe Technologies的積極不尋常項目相對於其利潤來說相當可觀。因此,我們可以推測,這些不尋常的物品使其法定利潤明顯高於原來的水平。

Our Take On GoodWe Technologies' Profit Performance

我們對GoodWe Technologies利潤表現的看法

GoodWe Technologies had a weak accrual ratio, but its profit did receive a boost from unusual items. On reflection, the above-mentioned factors give us the strong impression that GoodWe Technologies'underlying earnings power is not as good as it might seem, based on the statutory profit numbers. Keep in mind, when it comes to analysing a stock it's worth noting the risks involved. Our analysis shows 4 warning signs for GoodWe Technologies (2 are a bit concerning!) and we strongly recommend you look at them before investing.

GoodWe Technologies的應計比率較低,但其利潤確實受到不尋常項目的提振。經過反思,上述因素給我們留下了強烈的印象,即根據法定利潤數字,GoodWe Technologies的潛在盈利能力並不像看起來那樣好。請記住,在分析股票時,值得注意所涉及的風險。我們的分析顯示 GoodWe Technologies 有 4 個警告信號(2 個有點令人擔憂!)我們強烈建議您在投資之前先看看它們。

Our examination of GoodWe Technologies has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. And, on that basis, we are somewhat skeptical. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful.

我們對GoodWe Technologies的審查側重於某些可能使其收益看起來好於實際的因素。而且,在此基礎上,我們有些懷疑。但是,如果你能夠將注意力集中在細節上,總會有更多的事情需要發現。例如,許多人認爲高股本回報率是有利的商業經濟的標誌,而另一些人則喜歡 「關注資金」,尋找內部人士正在買入的股票。雖然可能需要你進行一些研究,但你可能會發現這份免費收集的擁有高股本回報率的公司,或者這份擁有大量內幕持股的股票清單很有用。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論